Location of Repository

Power, norms and institutional change in the European Union: the protection of the free movement of goods

By Dionyssis G. Dimitrakopoulos


How do institutions of the European Union change? Using an institutionalist approach, this article highlights the interplay between power, cognitive limits, and the normative order that underpins institutional settings and assesses their impact upon the process of institutional change. Empirical evidence from recent attempts to reinforce the protection of the free movement of goods in the EU suggests that, under conditions of uncertainty, actors with ambiguous preferences assess attempts at institutional change on the basis of the historically defined normative order which holds a given institutional structure together. Hence, path dependent and incremental change occurs even when more ambitious and functionally superior proposals are on offer

Topics: polsoc
Publisher: Griffith Law School
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:130

Suggested articles



  1. (1990). A logic of institutional change. doi
  2. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. doi
  3. (1963). A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. doi
  4. (1947). Administrative Behavior. doi
  5. (1987). Allgemeine Institutionentheorie als Rahmen für die Theorie politischer Institutionen. doi
  6. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo: doi
  7. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory, doi
  8. (1997). Amsterdam European Council: Presidency conclusions. Document SN00150/97, http://ue.eu.int.en/info/eurocouncil/index.htm (downloaded on 29
  9. (1984). Approaches to the state. Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics, doi
  10. (1998). Avis du Service Juridique sur la proposition de règlement instaurant un mécanisme d’intervention de la Commission pour l’élimination de certaines entraves aux échanges.
  11. (1982). Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1877-1920. Cambridge: doi
  12. (1997). Case C-265/95, Commission of the European Communities v French Republic.
  13. (2001). Commission of the European Communities doi
  14. (1998). Council of the European Union (1998a). Council Regulation (EC)
  15. (1998). Debates of the European Parliament. Verbatim report of proceedings,
  16. (1994). Die Eigenart der Institutionen: Zum Profil politischer Institutionentheorie. doi
  17. (1995). Die Flexibilität rechtlicher Institutionen, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und doi
  18. (1996). Do institutions make a difference? Non-institutionalism, neoinstitutionalism, and the logic of common decision-making in the European Union, doi
  19. (1997). European Court Reports, doi
  20. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics and choice, doi
  21. (1987). Grundfragen der Theorie politischer Institutionen: Forschungsstand doi
  22. (1973). Implementation. How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: doi
  23. Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics, doi
  24. (1999). Institutionalism and the European Union: International relations and comparative politics, doi
  25. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change, doi
  26. (1977). L’Acteur et le Système. doi
  27. (1972). Le rôle des états membres dans l’application du droit communautaire, doi
  28. (1995). Les politiques publiques comme construction d’un rapport au monde.
  29. (1998). New institutionalism and the governance of the Single European Market, doi
  30. (1998). Opinion on the proposal for a Council regulation (EC) creating a mechanism whereby the Commission can intervene in order to remove certain obstacles to trade. Document IND/657, 29 April.
  31. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms, doi
  32. (1997). Proposition de Règlement (CE) du Conseil instaurant un mécanisme d’intervention de la Commission pour l’élimination de certaines entraves aux échanges.
  33. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. doi
  34. (0385). Report on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) creating a mechanism whereby the Commission can intervene in order to remove certain obstacles to trade (rapporteur: Peter Skinner).
  35. (1998). Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council,
  36. (1989). Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: doi
  37. (2000). Same menu, separate tables: The institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration, doi
  38. (2000). Seek and Ye Shall Find!” Linking Different Perspectives on Institutional Change. Preprint 2000/6. Bonn: Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht der Gemeinshcaftgüter.
  39. (1988). Sovereignty: An institutional perspective, doi
  40. (1992). Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: doi
  41. (1997). The dynamics of inertia: institutional persistence and change in telecommunications and health care, doi
  42. (2000). The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes. doi
  43. (2000). The free movement of goods as a possibly ‘Community’ limitation on industrial conflict, doi
  44. (1998). The Governance of the Single European Market. Manchester: doi
  45. (1977). The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. doi
  46. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders, doi
  47. The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change, doi
  48. (1996). The new institutionalism and EC governance: The promise and limits of institutional analysis, doi
  49. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. doi
  50. (1996). The path to European integration. A historical institutionalist analysis, doi
  51. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action, doi
  52. (1999). Un instrument d’intervention rapide pour sauvegarder l’unicité du Marché intérieur: le Règlement 2679/98.
  53. Wie verändern sich Institutionen? Revolutionärer und schleichender Institutionenwandel, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.