Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Physicalism, conceptual analysis, and acts of faith

By Jennifer Hornsby


Frank Jackson and the author each take the other to hold a position in philosophy of mind that it is extremely difficult to sustain. This chapter tries to say something about how that can be. It seeks to demonstrate the sanity of Jackson's opponents and the fragility of his own position than to hold out for the truth of any particular doctrine. It wants to bring to the surface an assumption in ontology, which is seen as a crucial part of the grounding of Jackson's particular version of physicalism. Once it is appreciated that this assumption is contestable, Jackson's opponents may be seen in a different light from the one in which they appear in his writings. More generally, a connection will appear between the vast literature on physicalism as a topic in philosophy of mind and the equally vast literature on material constitution as a topic in metaphysics

Topics: phil
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). 34 Using ‘the world’ in Jackson’s way, one readily comes to assume the position of what Fine
  2. (1988). Against Causal Reductionism’, doi
  3. (2003). Conceptual Analysis and Acts of doi
  4. (1992). Constitution is not Identity’, doi
  5. (1998). From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis doi
  6. (1987). Global Supervenience and Reduction’, doi
  7. (1970). How to Define Theoretical Terms’, doi
  8. (1981). Mind and Meaning doi
  9. (1968). On Being in the Same Place at the Same Time’, doi
  10. (2000). On the Metaphysics of Human Agency’ (Discussion, with Jennifer Hornsby and Lynne Rudder Baker),
  11. (1984). Ontological Supervenience’, doi
  12. (2000). Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View doi
  13. (1987). Remnants of Meaning doi
  14. (1998). Reprinted as Ch.5 in his Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind,
  15. Rudder 1997: ‘Why Constitution is not Identity’, doi
  16. (1982). Spatially Coinciding Objects’,
  17. (1970). The Same F’, doi
  18. (1982). Weak Supervenience’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.