Location of Repository

Thinking like a man? The cultures of science

By Lynne Segal


Culture includes science and science includes culture, but conflicts between the two traditions persist, often seen as clashes between interpretation and knowledge. One way of highlighting this false polarity has been to explore the gendered symbolism of science. Feminism has contributed to science studies and the critical interrogation of knowledge, aware that practical knowledge and scientific understanding have never been synonymous. Persisting notions of an underlying unity to scientific endeavour have often impeded rather than fostered the useful application of knowledge. This has been particularly evident in the recent rise of molecular biology, with its delusory dream of the total conquest of disease. It is equally prominent in evolutionary psychology, with its renewed attempts to depict the fundamental basis of sex differences. Wars over science have continued to intensify over the last decade, even as our knowledge of the political, economic and ideological significance of science funding and research has become ever more apparent

Topics: psysoc
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:193

Suggested articles



  1. (1992). A Personal View of the Project’
  2. (2001). Academic Instincts, doi
  3. (2001). Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction, doi
  4. (1993). Exploding the Gene Myth, doi
  5. (1978). For Her Own Good: doi
  6. (1994). Higher Superstition: The Academic left and its Quarrels with Science, doi
  7. (1998). How many children can one man have? doi
  8. (1998). in Hughes, C. 'The Guardian Profile, Richard Dawkins: The man who knows the meaning of life', The Guardian: Saturday Review',
  9. (2000). Is there Science after the Cold War?’ Le Monde,
  10. (2003). Leys (2002)‘Science and Race: Before and After the Human Genome Project’ in Fighting Identities: Race,
  11. (2002). Madness, doi
  12. (2002). Marital Suitors Court Social Science Spin-sters: Perils and paradoxes of performing Public Sociology in Postmodern Society;, Talk delivered at leeds University. doi
  13. (1996). Meeting Polemics with Irenics in the Science Wars, Social Text spring/summer, doi
  14. (1996). My Enemy’s Enemy is – Only Perhaps – My Friend’, doi
  15. (1992). narratives, Body Boundaries’,
  16. (1999). Pursuring the Unpopular: A History of Courage, Viruses, and Cancer'
  17. (2001). Science, Money and politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion, doi
  18. (1985). Sex and Germs: The Politics of AIDS,
  19. (1995). Sex, Death and the Education of Children,
  20. (1995). The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, doi
  21. (1993). The Disorder of Things, Massachusettes:
  22. (1991). The Doctrine of DNA: Biology as Ideology,
  23. (1913). The Emancipation of English Women,
  24. (1995). The Gender of Modernity, doi
  25. (1999). The Missing Moment: How the Unconscious Shapes Modern Science, doi
  26. (1963). The Poet and the City’. The Dyers Hand,
  27. (1992). The psychological Foundations of Cultyre’ in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the doi
  28. (1976). The Selfish Gene,
  29. (1992). The Social Power of Genetic Information’ in Code of Codes: scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project,
  30. (1959). The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, doi
  31. (2002). The unnatural nature of science: Why science does not make (common) sense,
  32. (1996). Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity', Social Text spring/summer, doi
  33. (1998). Unweaving the Rainbow ,
  34. (2001). When Things Strike back- a possible contribution of science studies’, doi
  35. (1999). Why feminism? Gender,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.