Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in practice.

By Adebowale Adeagbo

Abstract

In my practice experience and exploration of literature, I discovered that there are limited examples and research about organisations that aim to change from a charity to a social enterprise. In addition to this, there are limited knowledge and understanding about what social enterprise and social entrepreneurship are and a lack of frameworks that will enable one to know a social enterprise and social entrepreneur when you see one. This research, therefore, is an exploration of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in practice, arriving at working definitions and frameworks. It examines the process, experiences and challenges that come with an organisation - Age Concern Bexley - changing from a charity to a social enterprise. The research then shares the experiences and the challenges that come with such organisational change\ud The research also examines and exposes my role and experiences - as the Chief Executive, social entrepreneur, leader and change agent, during this period. The research\ud then provides an insight into the self-discovery, self evaluation and reflections of a social entrepreneur in practice, especially from the insider practitioners' perspective, thereby enabling seeing social enterprise and social entrepreneurship from the lens of a social\ud entrepreneur. This research does not look into the issues surrounding governance during this change; as recent researches concluded that governance have little impact in this context( Young,2006). My view is that governance is importany and relevant; although the experience during this research does highlight that it was not a major issue. However,I would recommend it as an area of and for future research. The research combines empiricism and rationalism with iterations. In the research, I applied methodical pluralism as overarching research methodology by applying a portfolio of methodologies, using different methods to gather necessary data from different sources. The research contributest o practice with the establishment of a social enterprise service at Age Concern Bexley whilst also developing a set of high-level challenges that organisations that aim to explore social enterprise need to be aware of and how to manage them. The research contributes to theory by arriving at a working definition and framework of social enterprise. It also provides a better understanding of social entrepreneurship in practice and the role of a social entrepreneur as a leader and change agent. Other contributions to theory are the employment of metaphors to explain organisational change,the application of socio-psychological theory of labelling to explain the deviancy of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship and argument for sector differentiation, that is, social enterprise as a distinct sector. Some other contributions to practice are the showcasing of social enterprise in practice, the establishment of Bexley Social Enterprise Consortium, the establishment of an international development social enterprise organisation - Hephzibah - and the aim of\ud establishing a social enterprise academy in Nigeria. These are to enable me put into further practice, what I have learnt through this research. The research concludes that the practice of social enterprise is here to stay, that social entrepreneurial organisations need social entrepreneurs in leadership and that it will be challenging for existing charities to convert in totality to social enterprises.\ud 1

Topics: bmm
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk:10421

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1991). An Evaluation of Delphi. doi
  2. (1998). An Overview of Four Futures Methodologies. Retrieved from wwwsochamaiii. edu 1-future471LANGfitml, 1 Oth
  3. (1981). Appýying educational research: a practical guide for teachers.
  4. (2002). Be more businesslike.
  5. (2005). Building Blocks or stumbling blocks? In Socialenterprise.
  6. (2005). Capitalizing on convergence. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Winter
  7. (2005). Charities face uncertain future.
  8. (2000). Charity for profit: how the new social entrepreneurs are creating good by sharing wealth.
  9. (2002). Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Evaluation Related Rural Tourism Development Research. Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, Wellesbourne Campus, High Wycombe HP13 5BB,
  10. (2005). Communities in Controt The new third sector agenda for public service reform. London: The Social Market Foundation ALESSANDDRINI, M.,
  11. Consensus development methods and their use in dinica1guideline development a review UK:
  12. (2007). Considering organizations structure and design from a complexity paradigm perspective.
  13. (2005). Creating a Hybrld For-Profit / Non-Profit Social Enterprise Structure.
  14. (2006). Debate of'fourth sector'
  15. (1975). Delphi critique, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, SCHWAB FOUNDATION FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP.
  16. (1990). Delphi: A catalytic strategy for motivating curriculum revision by faculty. doi
  17. (2008). Designing and Implementing a Competency-based Curriculum. Leadership Implications,
  18. (2002). Designing Effective Organisations.
  19. (2005). Developing fledging social enterprises? A study of the support required and means of delivering it. doi
  20. (2005). Doing autoethnography.
  21. (1998). Educating for the New World Order. Education Reporter,
  22. (2005). Eight Basic Principles for Not-for-profit Entrepreneurs. Not-fff-PrOflt World, Volume 19, Number 4 July/August 2001; Published by the Society for Not-for-profit Organisations
  23. (2001). Enterprising Nonprofits., A Toolkit for Social Entrepreneurs.
  24. (1995). Ethical Issues for Teacher Researchers. The Scottish Council for D
  25. (1994). Ethical Issues in Qualitative Research: What Would You Do? Paper presented at the Australian Association of Research
  26. (1994). Ethical Issues in Qualitative Research: What Would You Do? Paper presented at the Australian Association of Research in Education. Australia:
  27. (1983). Ethnography Principles in Practice. London & doi
  28. (2006). Facing the leadership challenge in Socialenterprisemagazine.
  29. (2006). Fear and loathing in the field: emotional dissonance and identity work in ethnographic research,
  30. (2007). For Love and Money Governance and Social Enterprise. UK:
  31. (2005). from http: //www. ualberta. ca] PAYNE, B.;
  32. (1988). From surviving to thriving: black women managers in Britain. Thesis (PhD).
  33. (2005). from www. ualberta. ca
  34. (1975). Group techniques forprogram planning.
  35. (2003). Guidance on mapping social enterprise. - final report to the DTI Social Enterprise Unit. London:
  36. (2003). Guidance on mapping social enterprise. - final report to the DTI Social Enterprise Unit. London: DT I
  37. (2006). Holy Bible. London:
  38. (1992). How can my philosophy of action research transform and improve my professional practice and produce a good social order? -A Response to Ortrun ZuberSkerritt.
  39. (2005). Information Briefing forAge Concerns.
  40. (2001). Introducing Social Enterprise. London: SEL SONOMA.
  41. (2004). is the Social Entrepreneur a New Type of Leader? " Leader to Leader. doi
  42. (2008). Leaders and Leadership Roles in Relation to Effective Management of the Human Resources in People Management. Volume 6-
  43. (2004). Leadership in Organisations: current issues and key trends. doi
  44. (2006). Leadership Qualities Framework. UK: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement.
  45. (2000). Leadership that gets results in Harvard Business Review,
  46. (2002). LearninalTeachinalTrabnq for Social Entrepreneurship Queensland: Rockhampton Enterprise Ltd.
  47. (1986). Linking data. London: Sage doi
  48. Linking Research to Educational Practice Symposium paper at the Australian
  49. (2004). Living spaces for talk with/in the academy.
  50. (2005). London: Social Enterprise Coalition
  51. (1983). Looking Forward' A Guide to Futures Research, doi
  52. (2003). Managing and Measuring Social Enterprise. London:
  53. (2008). Managing Authenticity: the paradox of great leadership in Harvard Business Review, doi
  54. (2007). Metaphor use in the entrepreneurial process.
  55. (2006). Missing Link in Social Enterprise. London: Bexley Print THIRD SECTOR.
  56. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A research paradigm whose time has come. doi
  57. (1996). New Social Entrepreneurs: The Success, Challenge and Lessons of Not-for-profit Enterprise Creation. San Francisco: Robefts Foundation, Homeless Economic Development Fund ENQUIRE WITHIN DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED.
  58. (2000). New writing practices in qualitative research.
  59. (2000). NGDOs as a moment in history: beyond aid to social entrepreneurship or civic innovation? doi
  60. (2007). OLanford Soclal Innovatlon Review.
  61. (1996). Organisation Design.
  62. (1963). Outsiders., Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. doi
  63. (2005). Paper presented at the Open University,
  64. (2005). Perspectives on doing case study research in organisations, MOnggement,
  65. (2002). Placing the Social economy. London: Rutledge ANDRANOVICH, G.,
  66. (2003). Practitioner Research for organisational knowledge in Management Learning,
  67. (2005). President Highlights Faith-Based Initiative at )I Leadership Conference ,
  68. (1955). Principles ofpersonal construct psychology.
  69. (1996). Profits for Nonprofits: Find a Corporate Partner. Harvard Business Review,
  70. (2005). Public Health Report.
  71. (2005). Purpose and profit go together. The Wa# Street Journal,
  72. (2005). Reflections on theorizing.
  73. (2003). Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story.
  74. (2003). Research philosophy: towards an understanding in
  75. (2001). Researching social enterprise, London:
  76. (2004). Resource papers in action research
  77. (2001). Sleeping with the enemy? Exploiting the textual turn in management research. doi
  78. (2002). Social enterprise should be as familiar a concept as fair trade.
  79. (2001). Social Enterprise, Social Economy. London: SEL Moving Ahead Conference report
  80. (2002). Social Enterprise: A Strategy for Success. London: DTI/Pub
  81. (2002). Social Enterprise: flavour of the month or sign of the times?
  82. (2002). Social Enterprise: real business, realprofits, real impact,
  83. (1999). Social Enterprises, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Lnovelopment. London: OECD /U O'HEFFERMAN, P.,
  84. (1998). Social entrepreneurs are vital for health promotion - but they need supportive environments too. doi
  85. (2000). Social entrepreneurship -a new look at the people and the potential. doi
  86. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: The case for definition.
  87. (2002). Social Entrepreneurship: Towards an entrepreneurial culture for socia and economic development. International Board Selection Committee, Ashoka: Innovators for the Public Prepared by request for the Youth Employment Summit,
  88. (2003). Social report for the period Ist
  89. (1975). Some Methods of Futures Research, Menlo Park: Institute for the Future.
  90. (2003). Speech in House of Lords.
  91. (2007). Stop talking about full cost recovery. 27
  92. (2005). Strategic Planning in non-profit or for-profit organisations. London: Sage
  93. (2006). Subjectivity and emotions as sources of insight an ethnographic case study: a tale of the field,
  94. (1998). Sustainable Regeneration: Good Practice Guide. London:
  95. (1991). The change masters. doi
  96. (1972). The Delphi method: an experimental application of group opinion. In doi
  97. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and anaI ys i s, doi
  98. (1994). The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. doi
  99. (1994). The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? doi
  100. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. doi
  101. (1999). The Enduring Skills of Change Leaders". doi
  102. (1992). The Expertise of the Change Agent- Public performance and backstage activity. London: Prentice Hall. hange in
  103. (2007). The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. doi
  104. (2003). The Impact of Internet Use on Inter-Firm Relationships in Australian Service Industries. doi
  105. (1994). The Ladder of Inference,, the Fifth Discipline Fieldbook.
  106. (1987). The Leadership Challenge. doi
  107. (2001). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship - Entrepreneur in Residence.
  108. (2005). The Myths of Social Enterprise: A critique of assumptions. doi
  109. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. doi
  110. (2005). The Pillars of Planning
  111. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, doi
  112. (2001). The social enterprise source book. Massachusetts: Northland Institute
  113. (2003). There's more to business than you think A Guide to Social Enterprise. London: SEC SOCIAL ENTERPRISE LONDON.
  114. (2003). There's more to business than you think. Lancashire: Social Enterprise Coalition
  115. (2003). Toward holism: The significance of methodological pluralism.
  116. (1994). Transforming qualitative data. doi
  117. (1999). Unleashing the New Resources and Entrepreneurship for the Common Good: a Scan, Synthesis and Scenario for Action. Battle Creek, Mi: WK. Kellogg Foundation.
  118. (2000). Who wants to be an entrepreneur? Young adult attitudes to entrepreneurship as a career. Career Development International, doi
  119. (1993). Why Futures Studies'? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.