Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

"That's how we do it...we treat them all the same": an exploration of the experiences of patients, lay carers and health and social care staff of the care received by older people with dementia in acute hospital settings.

By Fiona Cowdell

Abstract

... we treat them all the same' This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients, lay carers and health \ud and social care staff of care received by older people with dementia in the acute hospital setting. In view of the ageing population, an increasing prevalence of dementia and the emerging dignity agenda this is a particularly topical subject. Four elements are included in this thesis: a literature review, a research study, a practice development project and an integrative review. A literature review sets \ud person-focused research in the context of dementia research as a whole. It also identifies ways in which studies have been conducted in an ethical and meaningful manner. An ethnographic approach was used in the research study to collect data through observation, conversations and interviews. Findings portray a bleak picture of the \ud care of this vulnerable group. Patients demonstrated, through words and actions, how difficult they found the experience. Lack of communication was an issue as \ud was the obvious distress caused by delivery of personal care. Lay carers were relatively uncritical although this may have been due, in part, to the recruitment process. Staff generally appeared to have good intention. Most stated that they had received little or no preparation or education in dementia care. Many staff functioned almost entirely within thebed and body'framework. They frequently \ud avoided communication with patients. Staff worked in a deeply embedded habitus, in which they appeared not to really think about what they were doing. They demonstrated a lack of empathy with patients. The concept that staff were working in a 'switched off mode and lacked empathy \ud called for a practice development project that engaged them on both cognitive and emotional levels. A practice development project based on the philosophies of confluent education and situated learning was implemented. Initial evaluation has demonstrated some tangible changes in practice. An integrative review draws these elements together into a coherent whole. Potential contributions to the body of knowledge are acknowledged, as are limitations of the work. This study has shown that people with dementia, even those at an advanced stage and with superimposed physical illness, can be engaged in research that is both ethical and meaningful. It has shown that \ud improvements in practice are possible. They need to be underpinned by a belief in the personhood of staff as well as patients. Areas for further research and practice development in this vital subject have been identified

Topics: med
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk:10449

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). 1 Government doi
  2. (2003). Acute Nursing Care for People witb Dementia Wbat Happens Wben a Person witb Dementia is Admitted to Hospital for Acute Care. University of the West of England,
  3. (1998). An ethnography of dementia.
  4. (1999). An investigation of the components of best nursing practice in the care of acutely ill hospitalized older patients with coincidental dementia: a multimethod design. doi
  5. (1999). Assessing patients in the early stages of irreversible dementia. doi
  6. (1999). Caring for people in acute settings: lessons learned from an action research study in accident and emergency. doi
  7. (2000). Defining the outcomes of community care: the perspectives of older people with dementia and their carers. doi
  8. (1997). Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. doi
  9. (1993). Doing Critical Etbnograpby.
  10. (2002). Ethical issues in dementia care research.
  11. (2002). Fluctuating awareness and the breakdown of the illness narrative in dementia. doi
  12. (2002). From ritual to relationship. Dementia: doi
  13. (2002). Hearing the Voice of People with Dementia. doi
  14. (2003). Including older people with dementia: challenges and strategies. doi
  15. (2000). Including the Person with Dementia in Designing and Delivering Care. doi
  16. (2000). Informed consent: process or outcome? doi
  17. (1975). Mini-mental state': a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. doi
  18. (2004). Mission drift in qualitative research, or moving toward a systematic review of qualitative studies, moving back to a more systematic narrative review.
  19. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. doi
  20. (2005). Of the edgelands": broadening the scope of qualitative methodology. doi
  21. (2003). People with dementia and their relatives: personal experiences of Alzheimer's and the provision of care. doi
  22. (2003). Personal spirituality of persons with early-stage dementia. doi
  23. (2005). Processes and experiences of mutual support in professionally- led support groups for people with early-stage dementia. doi
  24. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Healtb Researcb 8,341-351. doi
  25. (1998). Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity. doi
  26. (2001). Seeking Consent: Working With Older People. Department of Health, doi
  27. (2002). Surviving manifestations of selfhood in Alzheimer's disease. doi
  28. (2001). Tell Me the Trutb': The Effect of Being Told the Diagnosis of Dementia from the Perspective of the Person witb Dementia. The Mental Health Foundation,
  29. (2008). The Author. journal compilation @ doi
  30. (1988). The challenge of double jeopardy -toward a mental health agenda for aging. doi
  31. (1997). The emergence of the person in dementia research. doi
  32. (1993). The perspective of the patient with Alzheimer's disease: a neglected dimension of dementia research. doi
  33. (2002). The Perspectives of People witb Dementia.
  34. (2004). Using negotiated consent in research and practice. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.