Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the interrelation of reputation with corporate
performance in a crisis and consider the factors that make up the balance between strong recovery,
bare survival and failure. The emphasis is on corporate communication and corporate governance.
Design/methodology/approach – The current debate on reputation and the validity of the term
reputation management is reviewed and cases studies from Australia and the UK are examined.
Findings – The paper finds that, in the case studies, poor management, unethical practices, a lack of
engagement with customers and other stakeholders, indifferent or aggressive performances by CEOs
and lack of preparedness for crisis communication severely or terminally affected the organisations. It
identifies a new reputational factor of predictability and considers why some organisations survive a
crisis that has strong negative ethical dimensions while others fail.
Originality/value – This paper scrutinises existing concepts of reputation and reputation
management and finds that they are not able to predict recovery, survival or failure of
organisations. A new definition of reputation is put forward and the factor of predictability is
emphasised in proposals for new applied theory
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.