Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Preceptorship Rotation Programme Evaluation Report

By Carol Wood, Kathleen Theresa Galvin and Farnaz Heidari
Topics: nw
Publisher: Bournemouth University
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk:11770

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1993). A reflection on issues for practice,
  2. (1995). Clinical support and the Project
  3. (2001). Evaluating preceptorship arrangements in a paediatric setting. doi
  4. (2001). Expectations of newly qualified nurses. doi
  5. (1996). Hospital nursing: ‘It’s a battle!’ A follow-up study of English graduate nurses. doi
  6. (2001). Inspiring confidence in new nurses.
  7. (1996). Is preceptorship the answer to reality shock? doi
  8. (2001). Newly qualified staff nurses’ perceptions of the role transition. doi
  9. (1999). Occupational stress in the newly qualified staff nurse.
  10. (2000). Please help! I’m newly qualified. doi
  11. (1996). Preceptorship and support for staff: the good and the bad. Nursing Times;
  12. (2000). Preceptorship Rotation Programme Evaluation Report HICKEY G.
  13. (1996). Preceptorship: a review of the literature. doi
  14. (1974). Reality Shock (Why Nurses Leave Nursing). doi
  15. (1991). Report on proposals for the Future of Community Education and Practice.
  16. (2000). Still fumbling along? A comparative study of the newly qualified nurse’s perception of the transition from student to qualified nurse. doi
  17. (1999). Supporting newly qualified nurses. doi
  18. (1996). The first year as a staff nurse: the experiences of a first cohort of Project doi
  19. (1995). The implementation of Project
  20. (2000). Today; 21: 58-64.Preceptorship Rotation Programme Evaluation Report HICKEY G.
  21. (2001). What do newly qualified nurses expect from preceptorship? Exploring the perspective of the preceptee. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.