Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

'Panorama's coverage of 9-11 and the war on terror'’

By David McQueen


The BBC's 'flagship' current affairs series Panorama backed away from reporting on the 9-11 attacks despite having a senior reporter with relevant expertise in the area. Subsequent coverage lacked investigative depth, recycled commonplace analogies with Hollywood films and drew\ud unfounded links between the 9-11 leader Mohamed Atta and Iraq. This paper examines Panorama's much criticised coverage of the September 11th attacks, drawing on textual analysis of archival material and interviews to revisit a disturbing chapter in British current affairs coverage.\ud \ud The paper will look specifically at journalistic practices which led to such a failure, including the role of the 'star' reporter, managerial interference, over-reliance on official sources and a culture of caution. It examines how Panorama failed to separate fact from fiction in its use of Hollywood imagery and intelligence services misinformation which contributed to a politically charged atmosphere of fear. It will also closely examine Panorama's claims about the subsequent anthrax attacks which have since been traced back to a US bio-weapons laboratory. These claims which tenuously linked Al Qaeda and foreign\ud powers were staged in highly dramatic ways drawing on horror and science fiction tropes and marked a further blurring of boundaries between fact and fiction.\ud \ud Panorama's coverage, in this respect, was typical of the media's response to the 9-11 atrocities and their aftermath by amplifying fear, echoing official lines of inquiry and avoiding awkward questions, for instance, about the role of domestic agents in the, now all-but-forgotten, anthrax attacks. The many failures of Panorama's 'investigative journalism' of this critical episode in recent history\ud proved extremely useful to the Bush and Blair governments. \ud \ud The paper will conclude by reviewing the lessons that can be learnt from Panorama's initial failure of nerve and subsequent failure to investigate

Topics: ccms, pol
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). A history of the Arab peoples. doi
  2. (2004). A moral imagination: the media’s response to the war on terrorism.
  3. (2002). Cleanup of anthrax will cost hundreds of millions of dollars. The Baltimore Sun. 18th December. Available at:,0,4389697.story [Accessed
  4. (2002). Decline and fall. The Observer, 22 September. Available at: [Accessed
  5. (2003). From 9/11 to terror war: the dangers of the Bush legacy. doi
  6. (2010). Hollywood and Arab identity in the Arabian Gulf. Thesis (M.A.). Leicester University. Available from:
  7. (2002). Letter and victim chronology. Federation of American Scientists.
  8. (2003). Panorama: fifty years of pride and paranoia.
  9. (2005). Passive immunotherapy for anthrax toxin mediated by an adenovirus expressing an anti-protective antigen single-chain antibody. doi
  10. (2002). Riddle of the spores. The Guardian 21st May. Available at:
  11. (2003). Spinning the war: political communications, information operations and public diplomacy in the war on terrorism. doi
  12. (2002). Taliban: Islam, oil and the new great game in central Asia. doi
  13. (2001). Televising war: from Vietnam to Iraq London: doi
  14. (2002). Television agora and agoraphobia post-September 11. In Zelizer, doi
  15. (2006). The angry buzz: This Week and current affairs television. doi
  16. (2006). The use and abuse of terror: the construction of a false narrative on the domestic terror threat. Centre for Policy Studies: London. Available at: r.pdf
  17. (2009). Times Topics: Anthrax. New York Times online. Available at:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.