Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

What Is Realism?

By Paul Snowdon

Abstract

In the paper to which I am responding, Professor Ayers has set himself the task of formulating a tenable version of realism. Professor Ayers does a number of things: he provides his reading of the origins and developments of the debate about realism and its alternatives in modern philosophy; he criticises some recent prominent ideas, as either inconsistent with realism, and hence as being, as he sees it, idealist, or as being in other ways inadequate; and, he spells out, sometimes without fully developing them, different aspects of the views he favours. Ayers's discussion is both interesting and rich, and my response cannot engage with much of it. I shall certainly not attempt to give an answer to the question in Ayers's title.Articl

Topics: PHI
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:sas-space.sas.ac.uk:1116
Provided by: SAS-SPACE

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1994). Causality, Interpretation and the Mind
  2. (1973). Experiences (Oxford,
  3. (1996). Externalism, Content and Causation’,
  4. (2002). forthcoming) ‘Ayers on Substances’,
  5. (1992). How to Interpret ‘Direct Perception’, in Tim Crane (ed), The Contents of Experience (Cambridge,
  6. (2001). What is Realism?’

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.