Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Personal and Sub-personal: A Defence of Dennett's Early Distinction

By Jennifer Hornsby

Abstract

Daniel Dennett introduced the term 'sub-personal' into philosophers' vocabulary thirty years ago. Dennett's uses of 'sub-personal' are of interest in connection with the development both of his own views and of the subject of philosophy of mind in the recent past. I have a particular reason for focusing on Dennett: his original distinction between personal and sub-personal levels of explanation is lost sight of in much recent work, with the result that a position that I should want to defend is lost sight of too. I shall present an argument designed to show that a satisfactory philosophy of mind must respect the distinction Dennett first made, and that this distinction is widely ignored nowadays. Even Dennett has deserted it, so that the position I want to defend is kept invisible. People lose sight of Dennett's personal/sub-personal distinction because they free it from its philosophical moorings. A distinction that serves a philosophical purpose is typically rooted in doctrine; it cannot be lifted out of context and continue to do its work. So I shall start from Dennett's distinction as I read it in its original context. And when I speak of 'the distinction', I mean to point not only towards the terms that Dennett first used to define it but also towards the philosophical setting within which its work was cut out.Articl

Topics: PHI
Year: 2000
OAI identifier: oai:sas-space.sas.ac.uk:822
Provided by: SAS-SPACE

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1991). Concepts, Connectionism and the Language of Thought’,
  2. (1969). Content and Consciousness doi
  3. (1984). Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting doi
  4. (1987). The Intentional Stance doi
  5. (1996). 31 I thank those who participated in the Stirling Workshop
  6. (1980). Actions. (Routledge and Kegan Paul:
  7. (1992). Physics, Biology and Commonsense Psychology’ in Reduction, Explanation and Realism, edited by D. Charles and K. Lennnon
  8. (1997). Simple Mindedness: A Defense of Naïve Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind
  9. (1994). Mind and World (Harvard University Press: doi
  10. (1992). A Study of Concepts doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.