Location of Repository

Impact measures for libraries and information services

By Roswitha Poll and Philip Payne

Abstract

PURPOSE - To demonstrate the importance of impact / outcome research in libraries. \ud DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH - The paper gives an overview of purposes and methods used in impact research and illustrates this through project experiences.\ud FINDINGS - Various projects worldwide are trying to prove that use of library services can positively influence skills and competences, attitudes and behaviour of users. The benefits that users experience by using library services can be assessed in terms of knowledge gained, higher information literacy, higher academic or professional success, social inclusion, and increase in individual well-being.\ud RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS - The main problem of impact research is, that influences on an individual are manifold and that therefore it is difficult to trace changes and improvements back to the library. The paper shows methods that are tested and used at the present. More investigation is needed to identify methods that could be used to show a library’s overall impact or to develop measures that would permit benchmarking between institutions. \ud PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS - The paper shows practical examples of impact assessment, covering “soft” methods like surveys, interviews, focus groups, observation and quantitative methods like tests, analysis of publications, or usage data.\ud ORIGINALITY/VALUE - The paper acquaints libraries with a topic that is not yet well known and, by showing practical examples, demonstrates how libraries can attempt to assess their impact

Topics: lib
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:373

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006). ( 2005), “Leeds Metropolitan University: the impact of the information literacy framework,
  2. (2004). A microscope or a mirror? A question of study validity regarding the us e of dissertation citation analysis for evaluating research collections”, doi
  3. (2004). A microscope or a mirror? A question of study validity regarding the use of dissertation citation analysis for evaluating research collections”, doi
  4. (2005). An attempt to quantif y the quality of student bibliographies”, doi
  5. (2005). An attempt to quantify the quality of student bibliographies”, doi
  6. (2003). Assessi ng collection usefulness: an investigation of library ownership of the resources graduate students use”, doi
  7. (2003). Assessing collection usefulness: an investigation of library ownership of the resources graduate students use”, doi
  8. (2002). Assessing information lit eracy skills in the California State University: a progress report”,
  9. (2002). Assessing information literacy skills in the California State University: a progress report”, doi
  10. (2004). Assessing student learning. Available resources”,
  11. (2002). Assessing the social impact of public libraries: what the literature is saying”,
  12. (2006). Associ ations and Institutions (IFLA) (2005), Alexandria Manifesto on Libraries. The Information Society in Action , available at: www.ifla.org/III/wsis/AlexandriaManifesto.html (accessed 11
  13. (1998). Association of College and Research Li braries (ACRL)
  14. (1998). Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) doi
  15. (2004). Counting on making a difference: assessing our impact“, VINE: doi
  16. (2005). Facilitating the impact implementation programme”,
  17. (2006). Gathering and applying evidence of the impact of UK university libraries on st udent learning and research: a facilitated action research approach”, doi
  18. (2006). Gathering and applying evidence of the impact of UK university libraries on student learning and research: a facilitated action research approach”, doi
  19. (2002). How to evaluate and measure the impact of the library’s collection on the learning outcome?”, paper given at the 68th IFLA
  20. (2002). I ntegrating information literacy into the science curriculum”, doi
  21. (2005). Impact / out come evaluation”,
  22. (2005). Impact / outcome evaluation”,
  23. (2001). Impacts & outcomes: searching for t he most elusive indicators of academic library performance”, in Meaningful measures for emerging realities.
  24. (2001). Impacts & outcomes: searching for the most elusive indicators of academic library performance”, in Meaningful measures for emerging realities.
  25. (2005). Improvi ng the quality of university libraries through citation mining and analysis using two new dissertation bibliometric assessment tools”, paper given at 71st IFLA Oslo
  26. (2002). Integrating information literacy into the science curriculum”, doi
  27. (2006). International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) (2005), Alexandria Manifesto on Libraries. The Information Society in Action, available at: www.ifla.org/III/wsis/AlexandriaManifesto.html (accessed 11
  28. (2005). Leeds Metropolitan University: the impact of the information literacy framework,
  29. (1997). Library use and academic achievement”, doi
  30. (2005). Meas uring the impact of higher education libraries”,
  31. (2004). Measuring the econom ic impact of
  32. (2004). Measuring the economic impact of the doi
  33. (2005). Measuring the impact of higher education libraries”,
  34. (1998). New Measures for the New Library: a Social Audit of Public Libraries, doi
  35. (1990). Performance measures for academic libraries”, in doi
  36. (1999). Placing a value on public library services”,
  37. (2000). Six impo ssible things before breakfast: a multidimensional approach to measuring the value of libraries”,
  38. (2000). Six impossible things before breakfast: a multidimensional approach to measuring the value of libraries”,
  39. (2002). Succe ssful students: does the library make a difference?”,
  40. (2002). Successful students: does the library make a difference?”, doi
  41. (2001). The Economic Value of Public Libraries, Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries, London, doi
  42. (2001). The impac t of libraries on learning, teaching, and research: report of the LI RG seminar held in
  43. (2001). The impact of libraries on learning, teaching, and research: report of the LIRG seminar held in
  44. (2005). The LIRG / SCONUL Measuring Impact Initiative overview of phase 1 impact projects”,
  45. (2006). The use of electr onic services and information literacy: a Glasgow Caledonian University study”, doi
  46. (2006). The use of electronic services and information literacy: a Glasgow Caledonian University study”, doi
  47. (2005). The value of public libraries doi
  48. (2005). The value of public libraries in doi
  49. (2006). Unterst ützen Bibliotheksbestände die Forschung? Zitatanalyse
  50. (2006). Unterstützen Bibliotheksbestände die Forschung? Zitatanalyse
  51. (2003). What do t hey know? Assessing the librar y’s contribution to student learning”,
  52. (2003). What do they know? Assessing the library’s contribution to student learning”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.