Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Repurposing learning objects: a sustainable alternative?

By Winnie O’Grady, Sheila Woodgate and Cathy Gunn

Abstract

Recent experience shows that reusable learning objects, like the computer assisted learning programmes of the early 1990s, have so far failed to achieve expected levels of integration into educational practice. This is despite technical interoperability, cataloguing systems, high quality standards, targeted dissemination and professional development initiatives. Analysis of this problem suggests that conceptualization of the problem may be limiting the scope of solutions. This paper proposes a sustainable and participative approach to reuse that involves repurposing learning objects for different discipline areas. For some time now there has been a growing awareness that even the most accessible resources have failed to be widely adopted by the educational community and as a result have also failed to fulfil their considerable educational potential. (Campbell, 2003, p. 35

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760500376413
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:96/core5

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1992). Blocks to the effective use of information technology doi
  2. (1992). Computers in teaching and learning doi
  3. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor and taxonomy, in:
  4. (2002). Education and learning objects: a primer, UCOL. Available online at: http:// www.cta.ac.nz/papers/LearningObjectsCPIT.doc (accessed 23
  5. (2003). Engaging with the learning object economy, in: A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning (London
  6. (1998). Institutional change in uncertain times: lone ranging is not enough, doi
  7. (2001). Learning objects: resources for distance education worldwide, International Review of Research
  8. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge: toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know, doi
  9. (2004). Re-enchanting education: the recovery of teaching as a sacred activity,
  10. (2003). Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning, Open and flexible learning series (London &
  11. (1996). Technology refusal and the organizational culture of schools, in: R. Kling (Ed.) Computerisation and controversy: value conflicts and social choices (San Diego, doi
  12. (1992). The future of computers in teaching and learning, doi
  13. (2001). The new meaning of educational change doi
  14. (2001). The next big thing? Three architectural frameworks for learning technologies, The Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards. Available online at: http:// www.cetis.ac.uk/content/20010828163808/viewArticle (accessed 2
  15. (2004). Thwarted innovation: what happened to e-learning and why?, Final report of the Weatherstation Project, The Learning Alliance, University of Pennsylvania. Available online at: http://www.irhe.upenn.edu/WeatherStation.html (accessed 4
  16. (2001). Towards a pedagogically sound basis for learning object portability and reuse, in: M. Keppel et al. (Eds) Meeting at the crossroads.
  17. (1992). Towards an organizational psychology model for the acceptance and utilisation of new technology in organizations, doi
  18. (1990). Using computers in university teaching: a perspective on key issues, doi
  19. (2001). Validating scholarship in university teaching: constructing a national scheme for external peer review of ICT Based teaching and learning resources,
  20. (2000). Watch IT: the risks and promises of information technologies for education doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.