Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e‐learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions

By Gilly Salmon

Abstract

E‐learning is in a rather extraordinary position. It was born as a ‘tool’ and now finds itself in the guise of a somewhat wobbly arrow of change. In practice, changing the way thousands of teachers teach, learners learn, innovation is promoted and sustainable change in traditional institutions is achieved across hundreds of different disciplines is a demanding endeavour that will not be achieved by learning technologies alone. It involves art, craft and science as well as technology. This paper attempts to show how it might be possible to capture and model complex strategic processes that will help move the potential of e‐learning in universities to a new stage of development. It offers the example of a four‐quadrant model created as a framework for an e‐learning strategy

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760500376439
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:97/core5

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). (Eds.) Handbook of distance education (Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), doi
  2. (2004). A changing process at German universities—innovation through information and communication technologies?,
  3. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (Buckingham, doi
  4. (2005). An ODL perspective on learning objects, doi
  5. (2004). Challenging hierarchies: the impact of e-learning, doi
  6. (1965). Corporate strategy doi
  7. (2004). Course developers as students: a designer perspective of the experience of learning online, doi
  8. (2005). Designing and evaluating e-learning in higher education: a review and recommendations, doi
  9. (2005). Distance education at the crossroad,
  10. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organizational change to e-learning implementation, doi
  11. (2004). E-learning in a knowledge capital: the Manchester universities experience,
  12. (2004). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online (2nd edn) doi
  13. (2002). E-tivities: the key to active online learning (London, doi
  14. (2005). e-University compendium, Part Two. Available online at: http:// www.heacademy.ac.uk/2249.htm (accessed 7
  15. (2005). Education & Skills doi
  16. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: patterns, pattern languages and design practice, doi
  17. (2004). Evidence for e-learning policy, doi
  18. (2005). Failure—the key to understanding success, doi
  19. (2004). February) Things to come, conference opening address at When worlds collide,
  20. (2004). How things have changed, doi
  21. (2004). Implementing a learning technology strategy: top-down strategy meets bottom-up culture, doi
  22. (2005). It’s installed … now get on with it! Looking beyond the software to the cultural change, doi
  23. (1990). John Dewey’s pragmatic technology doi
  24. (2001). Just how relevant is e-education to global education needs?, doi
  25. (2004). Managing the concept of strategic change within a higher education institution: the role of strategic and scenario planning techniques, doi
  26. (2002). Maximising the educational affordances of a technology supported learning environment for introductory undergraduate phonetics, doi
  27. (2002). Models of technology and change in higher education, report,
  28. (2004). Networks and learning: communities, practices and the metaphor of networks, doi
  29. (2004). October) Online learning in commonwealth universities: selected data from the
  30. (2004). On strategies of educational innovation: between substitution and transformation, doi
  31. (2004). Papers and debates on the economics and costs of distance and online learning. Bibliotheks und Informationssystem der Carl Ossietzky Universitaet,
  32. (2002). Re-engineering the university, doi
  33. (2004). Research into information and communications technology in education: disciplined inquiries for telling stories better, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, doi
  34. (2003). Strategy and capability: sustaining organizational change (Oxford,
  35. (1998). Supporting information and communication technology innovation, in higher education, doi
  36. (2004). Taking sociological imagination to school: an analysis of the (lack of) impact of information and communication technologies on education systems, doi
  37. (2001). Target setting for evolutionary and revolutionary process change, doi
  38. (2003). Teaching in 3D: pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning, doi
  39. (2002). The costs of networked learning, in: C. Steeples & S. Jones (Eds.) Networked learning: perspectives and issues (London, doi
  40. (2004). The next level in e-learning, doi
  41. (2005). The politics of virtual learning environments: environment change, conflict and e-learning, doi
  42. (2003). The quest for resilience,
  43. (2005). The search for learning community in learner paced distance education: or, ‘having your cake and eating it, too!’,
  44. (2004). Thwarted innovation: what happened to e-learning and why. Final report for the weatherstation project of the Learning Alliance,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.