Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Editorial

By Jane Seale

Abstract

Disability, technology and e‐learning: challenging conception

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760500480025
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:126/core5

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). Bedding down for the long haul-philosophy of service delivery for students who have a disability or a chronic medical condition. Available online at: http://www.eophea.anu.edu.au/
  2. (2000). Breaking down the barriers: a team approach to learning development, paper presented at
  3. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity (Cambridge, doi
  4. (2000). Creating enforceable civil rights for disabled students in higher education: an institutional theory perspective, doi
  5. (2006). Disability and e-learning in higher education: accessibility research and practice
  6. (2001). Exams and DSA for DB. Message posed to the Deaflink JISC Mailing list. Available online at: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind01&L=deaflink&T=0&F=&S=&P=477 (accessed 5
  7. (2000). Improving online access for people with disabilities, paper presented at
  8. (2003). Introduction to web accessibility. Available online at: http://www.webaim.org/ intro/ (accessed 5
  9. (2005). Overview of the general techniques for web content accessibility guidelines 2.0, paper presented at CSUN ‘05,
  10. (2002). PDF and public documents: a white paper (American Foundation for the Blind). Available online at: http://www.afb.org/section.asp?Documentid=1706 (accessed 10
  11. (2002). Physical disability and technology, in:
  12. (2004). Policy and provision for disabled students in higher education in Scotland and England: the current state of play, doi
  13. (2004). Should online course design meet accessibility standards?,
  14. (2004). Software accessibility standards and guidelines: progress, current status and future developments, Universal Access to the Information Society, doi
  15. (2004). The development of accessibility practices in e-learning: an exploration of communities of practice, doi
  16. (2000). The microchip revolution improving opportunities for students who have disabilities, paper presented at
  17. (2004). The use of guidelines to automatically verify Web Accessibility, doi
  18. (2002). Universal access and inclusion in design, doi
  19. (1996). Universal design. What it is and what it isn’t. Available online at: http:// trace.wisc.edu/docs/whats_ud/whats_ud.htm (accessed
  20. (1996). Universal design. What it is and what it isn’t. Available online at: http:// trace.wisc.edu/docs/whats_ud/whats_ud.htm (accessed 5
  21. (2002). University students take complaints to Anti-Discrimination Commissioner. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, TV Program Transcript. Available online at: http:// www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2002/s460046.htm (accessed 5
  22. (2005). W3C user agent accessibility guidelines test suite version 2.0 and implementation report, paper presented at CSUN ‘05,
  23. (2005). Web content accessibility guidelines 2.0: transitioning your website, paper presented at CSUN ‘05,
  24. (2004). Web site accessibility: what logo will we use today?, doi
  25. (2000). Wising up: strategies for moving towards an inclusive model of service provision for higher education students with disabilities, paper presented at

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.