Location of Repository

‘Living’ theory: a pedagogical framework for process support in networked learning

By Philipa Levy


This paper focuses on the broad outcome of an action research project in which practical theory was developed in the field of networked learning through case‐study analysis of learners’ experiences and critical evaluation of educational practice. It begins by briefly discussing the pedagogical approach adopted for the case‐study course and the action research methodology. It then identifies key dimensions of four interconnected developmental processes—orientation, communication, socialisation and organisation—that were associated with ‘learning to learn’ in the course’s networked environment, and offers a flavour of participants’ experiences in relation to these processes. A number of key evaluation issues that arose are highlighted. Finally, the paper presents the broad conceptual framework for the design and facilitation of process support in networked learning that was derived from this research. The framework proposes a strong, explicit focus on support for process as well as domain learning, and progression from tighter to looser design and facilitation structures for process‐focused (as well as domain‐focused) learning tasks

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760600837025
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:138/core5

Suggested articles



  1. (2003). A methodological framework for practice-based research in networked learning, doi
  2. (1995). Alone but together: adult distance study through computer conferencing doi
  3. (2000). Community development among distance learners: temporal and technological dimensions, doi
  4. (2000). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online, doi
  5. (2001). Engaging sympathies: relationships between action research and social constructivism, in:
  6. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development (Englewood Cliffs, doi
  7. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation doi
  8. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning (2nd edn) doi
  9. (2001). Learners still learn from experience when online,
  10. (2006). Learning a different form of communication’: experiences of networked learning and reflections on practice. doi
  11. (2006). Learning to learn in networked environments: a focus on ‘orientation’, in: doi
  12. (1989). Making sense of experiential learning: diversity in theory and practice (Milton Keynes, Society for Research in Higher Education/Open
  13. (2000). Networked learning in higher education: practitioners’ perspectives, doi
  14. (2002). Perspectives and issues in networked learning, in: C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds) Networked learning: perspectives and issues (London, doi
  15. (2004). Researching networked management learning, doi
  16. (2004). Review of e-learning theories, frameworks and models. JISC e-learning models desk study. Available online at: www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/
  17. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: a definition, doi
  18. (1982). Three modes of action research,
  19. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning (Milton Keynes,
  20. (1996). You and your action research project doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.