Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Discourses of writing and learning to write.

By Rosalind Ivanic

Abstract

This paper presents a meta-analysis of theory and research about writing and writing pedagogy, identifying six discourses – configurations of beliefs and practices in relation to the teaching of writing. It introduces and explains a framework for the analysis of educational data about writing pedagogy in which the connections are drawn across views of language, views of writing, views of learning to write, approaches to the teaching of writing, and approaches to the assessment of writing. The framework can be used for identifying discourses of writing in data such as policy documents, teaching and learning materials, recordings of pedagogic practice, interviews and focus groups with teachers and learners, and media coverage of literacy education. The paper also proposes that, while there are tensions and contradictions among these discourses, a comprehensive writing pedagogy might integrate teaching approaches from all six

Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:3948
Provided by: Lancaster E-Prints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000)Reflecting on Literacy in Education. doi
  2. (eds) (2000)Multiliteracies:Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. doi
  3. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures.
  4. A.(2000)CompanytoCompany.ACommunicativeApproachtoBusinessCorrespondence in English (3rd edn). Cambridge:
  5. (2000). access, diversity and design: A synthesis model for critical literacy education. doi
  6. (1970). and Learning.
  7. (1989). and Power. doi
  8. (1992). and Social Change. doi
  9. (1987). as choice. In
  10. (1994). Authorizing disadvantage: Authorship and creativity in the language classroom.
  11. BradleyM.,Paxton,S.,Mattern,C,andBergamo,H.)(1992)Constructingliteracyinthe classroom: Literate action as social accomplishment.
  12. (2001). Communication.
  13. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: doi
  14. (1991). Consciousness-raising about the writing process. In
  15. (2002). Critical literacy: Beyond reason. doi
  16. (1999). editors, andIntroduction: Raising criticalawareness of language: A curriculum aim for the new millennium.
  17. Education and Skills (DfES) (2000)Grammar for Writing.
  18. (1989). Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging Social Reality (first published
  19. (1995). Hygiene.
  20. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes.
  21. (1993). in science: Learning to handle textastechnology. InM.Halliday and J. Martin (eds) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. doi
  22. (1984). in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: doi
  23. (1993). Introduction to special issue on ‘Talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classrooms’. doi
  24. (1994). Introductionto Functional Grammar (2nd edn) (first published
  25. (1998). It was just like magic: A multi-modal analysis of children’s writing. doi
  26. J.(1989a)Writing to learn andlearning to write. InJ.Martin(ed.)FactualWriting: Exploringand Challenging Social Reality (first published 1985,Victoria:
  27. (1989). Learning about language. In
  28. (1998). Learning to see learning in the classroom: Developing an ethnographic perspective.
  29. (1995). Literacy Practices: Investigating Literacy in Social Contexts. doi
  30. (1994). Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. doi
  31. (2002). Materiality in children’s meaning-making practices. doi
  32. (1978). Meaning. doi
  33. N.(1992c)Theappropriacyof‘appropriateness’.InN.Fairclough(ed.)Critical Language Awareness.London:
  34. (1988). No common ground: Kingman, grammar and the nation. doi
  35. (1981). of Talk. doi
  36. (1997). Politics of Writing.
  37. (1992). Principles and practice of CLA in the classroom.
  38. (1996). Representational resources and the production of subjectivity.
  39. (1985). Social Context of Literacy.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Lillis,T.(2003)Studentwriting as‘academicliteracies’:Drawing onBakhtin tomovefrom critiqueto design.
  40. (1996). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology doi
  41. (1994). Social processes in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others).
  42. (1989). SocioculturalPractice (first published 1985,Victoria:
  43. Stotsky,S.(1990)Onplanning andwriting plans–orbewareofborrowedtheories.
  44. (1999). Teaching primary school children about the English language: A critique of current policy documents. doi
  45. (1989). Text:AspectsofLanguage in a Social-Semiotic Perspective (First published
  46. (1989). The discourse of geography: Ordering and explaining the experiential world. doi
  47. (1999). The National Literacy Strategy: A debate. In
  48. (2003). The teaching of ‘wrighting’: literacy education in a multimodal world.
  49. (1967). through English. London:
  50. (1973). without Teachers. London:
  51. Writing 243Kress, G. (2000)‘You’ve just got to learn how to see’: Curriculum subjects, young people and schooled engagement with the world. doi
  52. (1998). Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. doi
  53. (2000). Writing in Context.
  54. (1998). writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. doi
  55. (1997). Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.