Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Applied Linguists and Institutions of Opinion

By Greg Myers

Abstract

Public opinion research is not an area that has received much attention from applied linguists. But language lies at the heart of the procedures used to define, elicit, and report opinions, whether through such methods as polling, interviews, and focus groups, or through the less obvious channels of vox pop interviews, letters to the editor, radio phone-ins, or public hearings. In this paper I consider ways in which work in language studies—by linguists, conversation analysts, and social psychologists—might help us understand, improve, or question these procedures, and also give a new perspective on what opinions are. The relation of this new perspective to existing knowledge of academic and professional practitioners in the field may have parallels in other applications where applied linguists encounter experienced professionals and large organizations. Institutions of opinion feed back into political processes, so it is important that we consider them, not only as researchers and professionals, but also as citizens

Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:9553
Provided by: Lancaster E-Prints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). analyses aimed at improving existing techniques (such as HoutkoopSteenstra
  2. (1987). Arguing and Thinking : A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge ; Paris, doi
  3. (1995). Banal nationalism. London ; Thousand Oaks, doi
  4. (1996). Cognitive interview techniques:
  5. (1997). Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries and power on talk radio -Hutchby,I.' doi
  6. danger:
  7. (1996). Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. doi
  8. (1999). East Market Surveys (Waterton and Wynne
  9. (1995). From stuck debate to new conversation: A report from the Public Conversations Project.' doi
  10. (2000). Good to Talk?
  11. (2001). Individual Freedom in Language Teaching. doi
  12. (1999). Informational and interactional functions of slogans and sayings in the discourse of a support group.' doi
  13. (1996). Inside Sellafield.
  14. (1994). Language Shock: Understanding the Culture of Conversation. doi
  15. (1990). Opinion polls: a 'science' without
  16. (1993). Public opinion does not exist, (ed.).Sociology in Question.
  17. (1996). Quality of life' talk: The liberal paradox of psychological testing.' doi
  18. (2004). Questionnaires. Sage Benchmarks in Social Research Methods.
  19. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. doi
  20. (1996). Social identities in talk: speakers' own orientations.' doi
  21. (1981). The Design and Understanding of Survey Questions. doi
  22. (1979). The years I have chosen are those noted by Rosa and Dunlap to show shifts in opinion after the accidents at Three Mile Island

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.