Article thumbnail

Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England

By Marjolein Spaans

Abstract

Several European countries are adapting their planning system to current requirements of public and private sector and society. Examples of such countries are England and the Netherlands. The paper start with an overview of theoretical concepts of planning systems in relation to spatial planning. We then focus on the proposed and recent changes in the English and Dutch planning systems. What are the main objectives for the changes and how are they elaborated in planning instruments, procedures and institutional framework? The paper concludes with relating the changes in the two presented planning systems to the theoretical concepts op planning systems.

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1997). Algemene ontwikkelingen, recente evoluties en knelpunten in het Vlaams Gewest.
  2. (2001). Commission of the European Communities (CEC)
  3. (1997). De minidecreten van 13 juli 1994. Een stand van zaken, Tijdschrift voor ruimtelijke ordening en stedenbouw (6),
  4. (2001). Devolution, Regional Governance and Planning Systems
  5. (2003). Die Regionalpolitik der EU: Systementwicklung durch Politikgestaltung, in:
  6. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: state centric vs. multi-level governance,
  7. (1995). European social policy: between fragmentation and integration,
  8. (1993). European Urban Planning Systems: Diversity and Convergence,
  9. (2000). Euroscepticism’, political agendas and spatial planning: British national and regional planning in uncertain times,
  10. (2004). From Spaces of Place’ to ‘Spaces of Flows’? Territorial and Functional Governance
  11. (2005). Glossarium, http://europa.eu.int/scadplus/glossary/ ubsidiarity_nl.htm Getiminis,
  12. (2002). Grenzen verkend – Internationalisering van de ruimtelijke planning in de Benelux,
  13. (2004). Kabinetsstandpunt Nota Ruimte, ministeries van
  14. (1998). Modernising Planning, A Statement by the Minister for the Regions, Regenerations and Planning,
  15. (2000). New Labour, New Planning,
  16. (2005). Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM)
  17. (2002). Office of the Deputy Prime Minister ODPM
  18. (1999). Subsidiary and environmental policy: Which level of government should do what in the European Union? Working Paper Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.
  19. (1997). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies, Regional development studies, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,
  20. (2000). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies; United Kingdom, Regional development studies, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,
  21. (2001). The European Dimension of British Planning,
  22. (2005). The Hidden Face of European Spatial Planning: Innovations in Governance,
  23. (2002). The implementation of urban revitalisation projects; an international comparison,
  24. (1996). The rise of the network city, The information age: economy, society and culture 1,
  25. (2004). Values in a Vacuum? Towards an Integrated Multi-level Analysis of the Governance of European Space,
  26. (2000). Vlaams decreet op de ruimtelijke ordening,
  27. (2004). Vlaamse Provincies
  28. (1996). Vlaamse regering (2005) Ontwerp van decreet tot wijziging van het decreet van 18 mei 1999 houdende de organisatie van de ruimtelijke ordening en van het decreet betreffende de ruimtelijke ordening, gecoördineerd op 22 oktober
  29. (1999). Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR) [Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy]