Article thumbnail

The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model

By Andrea Bonfiglio


The objective of this article is to assess labour income and employment effects in Romania coming from rural development and structural policies defined in the proposed 2007-09 EU accession financial package. The methodology used is based on a multiregional I-O model derived by a three-stage estimation procedure. Main results show that EU accession will lead to large positive effects in Romania, which vary according to the region considered. In this connection, the South and the North- East regions are those on which benefits tend to concentrate. Finally, policy would seem to reduce regional and sectoral income disparities, leading to more balanced development. On the contrary, in terms of employment, policy would increase divergences, albeit, from an analysis of single region economy, a general tendency to a reduction of sector disparities is noticed.EU accession, rural development, structural actions, policy impact, multiregional I-O model, International Relations/Trade, C82, R15, R58,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). A Flexible Modeling Framework to Estimate Interregional Trade Patterns and Input-Output Accounts. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3359, The World Bank Group.
  2. (1961). A Technique for Estimating a Contingency Table Given the Marginal Row and Column Totals and Some Supplementary Data.
  3. (2004). Alternative Input-Output Matrix Updating Formulations.
  4. (1970). An Empirical Test of Interregional Input-Output Models: Estimation of 1963 Japanese Production.
  5. (1978). An Interregional Input-Output Approach to the Evaluation of non-survey methods.
  6. (2001). AntiSuppressants and the Creation and Use of Non-Survey Regional Input-Output Models.
  7. (1997). Effectiveness of farm policies on social and economic development in rural areas.
  8. European Commission (2004a). Accession negotiations: state of play on 30/06/04.
  9. European Commission (2004c). A financial package for the accession negotiations with Bulgaria and Romania. SEC(2004) 160 final.
  10. (1980). Exchanging regional input-output coefficients: a reply and further comments. Enviroment and Planning A
  11. (1980). Generation of regional input-output tables (GRIT): An introspection.
  12. (2004). Impact Analysis of the European Funds on Total Output, Households Income and Employment of North-West Development Region and Romania by Sectors.
  13. (1982). Input-Output Analysis in Developing Countries. Source, Methods and Applications.
  14. (1985). Input-Output Analysis: foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs,
  15. (1996). Measuring the Regional Economic Impact of Pluriactivity on Scottish farms.
  16. (1963). Multiregional Input-Output Analysis.
  17. (1983). Nonsurvey techniques: a critical review of the theory and the evidence.
  18. (1997). On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables: Reply.
  19. (1995). On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input-output tables.
  20. (1997). On the Construction of Regional IO Tables.
  21. (1953). Regional Analysis.
  22. (1979). Regional Economic Planning: Generation of Regional Input-Output Analysis,
  23. (1972). Regional Input-Output Models in the U.K.: A Reappraisal of Some Techniques.
  24. (2000). Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula.
  25. (2003). Romanian Ministry of Integration
  26. (2000). Structural Funds. Light and Shadow from Andalusia.
  27. (1996). The FLQ formula for generating regional input-output tables: an application and reformation. Working Papers in Economics 17,
  28. (1955). The Stability of Interregional Trading Patterns and Input-Output Analysis.
  29. (1996). Using location quotients to estimate regional input-output coefficients and multipliers.