Article thumbnail

Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar

By Christopher Stevens

Abstract

Many of the changes to developed country trade policy that affect developing countries do not fit neatly into the category of ‘liberalisation’ yet they are frequently assessed as if they did. The recent changes to the EU’s regimes for production and imports of sugar fall into this group: both production and trade policies were highly distorted before the change and will remain so after it, but the distribution of the effects of these distortions will be altered. This will affect three of the six Development Cooperation Ireland programme countries in Africa: Mozambique, Tanzania and Zambia. Returns from sugar exports to the EU will be less than otherwise would have been. How much lower depends critically on how the sugar market develops after 2009.Sugar, liberalisation, value chains

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. Action Plan on accompanying measures for Sugar Protocol countries affected by the reform of the EU sugar regime’, Commission Staff Working Paper, SEC(2005) 61, 17 January. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
  2. (2006). Agricultural Reciprocity under Economic Partnership Agreements, IIIS Discussion Paper,
  3. (2005). Coping with the Fall-out for Preference-Receiving Countries from EU Sugar Reform,
  4. Reforming the European Union’s sugar policy: Update of impact assessment [SEC(2003) 1022]. COM(2005)263 final’, Commission Staff Working Document, SEC(2005) 808, 22 June. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.