Article thumbnail

Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland

By Alan Matthews and Hannah Chaplin

Abstract

The EU Common Market Organisation has remained largely unchanged since its inception nearly 40 years ago. Reform has become inevitable due to changes to other sectors in the Common Agriculture Policy and pressure arising from international commitments. The current system provides sufficient support for all Member States to produce sugar, regardless of their efficiency. The proposed reform will therefore affect the least efficient producing regions most strongly. This paper examines the case of Ireland in light of the competitive position of its sugar sector in the EU context. Calculation of the likely impact on sugar beet gross margins and farm income suggest that many producers will want to exit sugar beet production. In light of this, the implications and possible strategies for growers and Irish Sugar are discussed.EU sugar policy, Irish agriculture, farm income

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less-developed countries,
  2. (2000). A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate. The Case of Migration Control,
  3. (1961). A theory of economic development,
  4. (2000). Arguing and Justifying: Assessing the Convention Refugees' Choice of Moment, Motive and Host Country,
  5. (1995). Arguing the American Dream a la Canada: former Soviet Citizens’ Justification for their choice of host country,
  6. (1997). Asylum and State Sovereignty: A comparison of the United States,
  7. (1993). Asylum Migration in Europe: Patterns, determinants and the role of East-West movements',
  8. (1998). Asylum Migration to the European Union: Patterns of Origin and Destination, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  9. (1994). Can Liberal States Control Unwanted Migration?,
  10. (2000). Council on Refugees and Exiles
  11. (1999). country of asylum by choice or by chance: asylum-seekers in Belgium, the Netherlands and the UK,
  12. (1989). Escape from violence: Conflict and the refugee crisis in the developing world,
  13. For Refugees, World Refugee Survey,
  14. forthcoming), Forced Migration and the Politics of BurdenSharing Beyond the State,
  15. forthcoming), The 'Soft' Europeanisation of Migration Policy: European integration and Domestic Policy Change,
  16. (1990). Friends or Strangers: The Impact of immigrants on the U.S.
  17. Home Office (2002), Reducing Asylum Applications, internal working paper in preparation for the ministerial meeting of 15 May, on file with author.
  18. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,
  19. (1992). International migration systems. A global approach.
  20. (1994). Introduction to Pooling, in:
  21. (1994). Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe, Chicago:
  22. (1996). Losing Control?
  23. (1994). Migration Policy and Politics in Receiving States,
  24. (1970). Migration, unemployment, and development: A two-sector analysis,
  25. (2002). Nailing Press Myths, www.refugeecouncil.org.uk Robinson, Vaughan and Jeremy Segrott
  26. (2000). Negotiating Asylum. The Hague,
  27. (1989). Networks, linkages and migration systems,
  28. (1992). Patterns and trends of international migration in
  29. (1999). Refugees and Others of Concern to UNHCR - Statistical Overview,
  30. (1985). Regression Space and Time A Statistical Essay,
  31. (1995). Rights across Borders,
  32. (1994). The concept of "Safe Third Country"
  33. (1993). The Concept of "Safe Third Country" and Expeditious Asylum Procedures: A Western European Perspective.”
  34. (1992). The Conundrum of Refugee Protection in Canada: From Control to Compliance to Collective Deterrence,
  35. (1998). The Cost of Survival: the trafficking of refugees to the UK, London: The Refugee Council.
  36. (1962). The costs and return of human migration,
  37. (2000). The Impact of Legislative Deterrence Measures on the Number of Asylum Seekers in Switzerland,
  38. (1993). Theories of international migration: review and appraisal,
  39. (2001). Time-Series-Cross-Section DATA: What have we learned in the past few years?,
  40. (1981). Village-community ties, village norms, and ethnic and social networks: A review of evidence from the Third World,
  41. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series crosssection data,
  42. (1999). Who has counted the refugees?' INHCR and the politics of numbers,
  43. (1998). Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Migration,