Article thumbnail

Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations

By Alan Matthews


This paper examines the case for special and differential (S&D) treatment for developing countries within the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and the particular instruments or exemptions it should contain. The S&D treatment currently allowed to developing countries in the Agreement and the use they have made of it is first described. The range of proposals put forward by developing countries (and by development NGOs in developed countries) is summarised, and the S&D provisions in the August 2004 Framework Agreement for Establishing Modalities in Agriculture are outlined. The reasons why developing countries want special and differential treatment under the AoA are discussed. Some of the main proposals in the Development Box are then reviewed in the light of the justifications presented by its proponents. The paper concludes that the potential exists in the Framework Agreement to take a significant step towards “operationally effective and meaningful provisions” for S&D treatment. While noting this positive outcome, the important objective for developing countries of gaining a reduction in the trade-distorting support and protection by developed countries should not be forgotten. Classification-CGE model, Doha Round, agriculture, tariff preferences, domestic support.

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). Agricultural Growth Linkages in Sub-Saharan Africa,
  2. (2003). Agricultural policies and trade, Chapter 3 in Global Economic Prospects for Developing Countries,
  3. (2000). Agriculture, Trade and Food Security: Issues and Options in the WTO Negotiations from the Perspective of Developing Countries, Part 1, Synthesis,
  4. (2003). Agriculture, Trade and Food Security: Synthesis of the Country Case Studies, in WTO Agreement on Agriculture: The Implementation Experience: Developing Country Case Studies, Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization.
  5. (2002). An Agricultural Safeguard Mechanism for Developing Countries, Report submitted to the UK Department for International Development,
  6. (2002). Boxing Match in Agricultural Trade: Will WTO Negotiations Knock Out the World’s Poorest Farmers?, Briefing Paper 32,
  7. (2002). Economy-wide Dimensions of Trade Policy Reform, Ch. 2 in Development, Trade and the WTO: A Handbook,
  8. (2002). Extending Special and differential treatment (SDT) in Agriculture for Developing Countries, Paper presented at the FAO Geneva Round
  9. (2000). Faster More Equitable Growth: The Relation between Growth in Agriculture and Poverty Reduction,
  10. (2000). Food Security and Trade Negotiations in the World Trade Organization: a Cluster Analysis of Country Groups,
  11. (2000). Globalisation, WTO and Food Security,
  12. (2000). Hungry for Trade,
  13. (2001). Incorporating food security concerns in a revised Agreement on Agriculture, Paper presented on the FAO Round Table on Food Security in the Context of the WTO
  14. (2004). International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council,
  15. (2001). Market Access: Issues and Options in the Agricultural Negotiations,
  16. (1995). Poverty and Policy,
  17. (2001). Proposal for a ‘Development Box’ in the WTO Agreement on Agriculture,
  18. (2001). Souveraineté alimentaire et négociations commerciales internationals.
  19. (1999). Special and differential treatment in the Millennium Round,
  20. (2003). Trade Reforms and Food Security: Conceptualizing the Linkages, Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization.
  21. (2003). Trade, Food Security and WTO Negotiations: Some Reflections on Boxes and their Contents, in OECD, Agricultural Trade and Poverty: Making Policy Analysis Count,
  22. (1999). TRQ Implementation in Developing Countries, Paper prepared for the World Bank/