Article thumbnail

Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality

By Antonio Bojanic and Michael Krakowski


This paper takes stock with the results of utility privatization in Bolivia. This paper deals with the process of structural reforms in this country and the specific results that have to date been accomplished in the electricity industry. It is mostly interested in exploring whether the reformation of this industry contributed to lessen poverty levels and whether in light of the obtained results, a reversal or a continuation of the reform process should take place. The paper shows that coverage of electricity users has grown faster in urban areas ever since the establishment of regulation. Although it is not argued that regulation has caused the increase in electricity consumers, the data does show that a comparatively faster urban growth rate of users takes place after 1995. In this sense, it seems plausible that regulation of the electricity industry has indeed lessen poverty levels in urban Bolivia by making this utility more accessible to larger segments of the urban population. The same cannot be said, however, about rural Bolivia. The results show that coverage has remained about the same in the last 10 years, with no discernible improvement after the transformation of the industry in 1995. When rural Bolivia is divided into income groups, the data shows that some of the poorest groups have indeed experienced a decline in coverage during the regulation period, which sheds doubts about the purportedly positive effects that structural changes in this industry were to have in the livelihoods of the poorest people in the country. Alternative ways which may improve the poverty reduction outcome of electricity regulation are explored.Regulation, Poverty Reduction, Bolivia, Food Security and Poverty, Public Economics, L51, O20, O54,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. 1998b, 1999c): La Regulacion Sectorial en Bolivia, Annual Reports, General Superintendency.
  2. (1992). Bolivia’s Answer to Poverty, Economic Crisis and Adjustment“, The Emergency Social Fund, World Bank Regional and Sectoral Studies,
  3. (2001). Capitalization, Regulation, and the Poor: Access to Basic Services in Bolivia“, Working Paper,
  4. (1997). Die wirtschaftliche Reformpolitik der Regierung Sanchez de Lozada, in:
  5. (2000). Do Local Governments Maximize Access Rates to Public Services Across Areas? A Test Based on Marginal Benefit Incidence Analysis“,
  6. (2000). Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, Third Edition,
  7. (2003). Growth, Poverty, and Income Distribution in Bolivia: A Sectoral and Regional Perspective“, Working Paper,
  8. (2002). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration
  9. (1994). Latin America: The Second Stage of Reform“,
  10. (2000). Light and Lightning at the End of the Public Tunnel“,
  11. (1998). Poverty Reduction Strategies – the Experience of Bolivia“,
  12. (2003). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers in Latin America: The Case of Bolivia“,
  13. (2000). Rethinking Subsidies for Infrastructure“, Mimeo, World Bank and
  14. (2001). Statistics Yearbook.
  15. (1972). The Process of Economic Regulation“, Antitrust Bulletin; reprinted in
  16. The World Bank (2001): “PRSP Sourcebook“,
  17. (2000). The World Bank (2002): “Bolivia: Poverty Diagnostic
  18. (1988). Theoretische Grundlagen der Regulierung“,
  19. (2002). Tropics, Germs, and Crops: How Endowments Influence Economic Development“, Working Paper 15,
  20. Unidad de Analisis de Politicas Economicas (2001): Statistics Yearbook, Annual Report.
  21. (2001). Utilities Privatization and the Poor: Lessons and Evidence from Latin America“, World Development,
  22. (2001). Yearbook Statistics for the Electric Industry, Annual Report.