Article thumbnail

Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA

By Vasilis Zervos


Using the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) as a case study, this paper examines how conflicting objectives in procurement policies by public space agencies result in anti-competitive procurement. Globally, public sectors have actively encouraged mergers and acquisitions of major contractors at the national level, since the end of the “Cold War”, following largely from the perceived benefits of economies of size. The paper examines the impact the resulting industrial concentration has on the ability of space agencies to follow a pro-competitive procurement policy. Using time series econometric analysis, the paper shows that NASA’s pro-competitive policy is unsuccessful due to a shift, since the mid-1990s, in the share of appropriations in favour of its top contractors.procurement, space industry, space agencies, NASA

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (1993). A Theory of
  2. (2004). Aeronautics and Space Report of the President,
  3. (2001). Air Force (USAF)
  4. (1997). Annual Procurement Report, Fiscal Year
  5. (1998). Annual Report, Washington, DC, United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Form K-11 available by SEC EDGAR database at http// edgar/data).
  6. (2006). Auditors criticize NASA project planning”, 23rd of January,
  7. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government,
  8. (2002). Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry
  9. (1998). Defence procurement, the single market and the European armaments agency”,
  10. (2002). Domestic procurement, subsidies and the arms trade”,
  11. (1995). Economics of defence R&D”,
  12. (2000). Future Management and Use of U.S. Space Launch Bases and Ranges,
  13. (1996). Game theory econometric models: Applications to procurements in the space industry”,
  14. (1991). Incentives, the budgetary process and inefficiently low production rates in defence procurement”,
  15. (1995). PcGive 8.0 An Interactive Econometric Modelling System, London,
  16. (2004). Private craft soars into space, history”,
  17. (1993). Public opinion: A powerful predictor of US defense spending”,
  18. (1995). The Economics of Defense,
  19. (2001). The Economics of the European Space Industry, DPhil Thesis in Economics,
  20. (1997). Where Do you Go after You’ve Been to the Moon?,
  21. (1992). Who’s Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries,