Article thumbnail

PEOPLE LEFT BEHIND: TRANSITIONS OF THE RURAL POOR

By Joseph J. Molnar and Greg Traxler

Abstract

Compared to their urban counterparts, the rural poor are more likely to be employed, more apt to be members of married-couple families, less likely to be children, less likely to be minority, and more likely to have assets but a negative income. This paper examines poverty rates and factors that affect mobility in and out of poverty among major categories of the rural poor. Particular attention is paid to farm workers and the rural farm population in the South. It endeavors to identify both structural conditions that perpetuate rural poverty and government interventions that ameliorate human suffering and break the cycle of poverty reproduction.Community/Rural/Urban Development,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from http://purl.umn.edu/30279

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. About that Lower Cost of Living in Nonmetro Areas." Rural Dev.
  2. (1966). Advisory Commission on Rural Poverty. The People Left Behind.
  3. (1989). American Indians: The First of This Land.
  4. (1984). An Overview of the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
  5. (1986). Bureau of Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States: National Data Books and Guide to Sources.
  6. (1947). Changes in the Distribution of American Family Incomes,
  7. Come and Get it: Distributional Biases in Social Service Delivery Systems." Policy and Politics,
  8. (1988). Defining Rural: Returning to our Roots. "
  9. (1961). Economic Areas of the United States.
  10. (1989). eds. Rural Poverty: Special Causes and Policy Reforms.
  11. (1988). Evaluation of Poverty Indicators.
  12. Family Change Among Black Americans: What Do We Know?"
  13. How Income Transfer Programs Affect Work, Savings, and the Income Distribution: A Critical Review."
  14. (1988). Human Capital for Agriculture." Chapter 14 in Agriculture and Rural Areas Approaching the Twenty-First Century,
  15. (1987). Measuring Employment and Unemployment."
  16. (1982). Natural Resource Bureaucracy and Rural Poverty."
  17. (1985). Natural Resource Dependence, Rural Development, and Rural Poverty.
  18. (1985). Natural Resources: Allocation, Economics, and Policy.
  19. One Fifth of the Nation's Children: Why are they Poor?"
  20. Perceptions of Barriers to Black Political and Economic Progress in Rural Areas."
  21. (1973). Political Economics of Rural Poverty in the South.
  22. Poverty and Opportunity Structure in Rural
  23. Poverty in the U.S.: Why is it So Persistent?"J.
  24. Race, Employment Hardship, and Inequality in the American Nonmetropolitan South."Am.
  25. (1989). Rural America: Economic Performance,
  26. (1989). Rural and Small Town America.
  27. Rural Community Development."An.
  28. (1985). Rural Development, Poverty, and Natural Resources: An Overview. Workshop Paper Series.
  29. (1989). Rural Planning and Development in the U.S.
  30. (1989). Rural Poverty, Welfare Eligibility, and the Negative Income Tax."
  31. Sex Differences in Economic Well-Being."
  32. Slipping Into and Out of Poverty: The Dynamics of Spells."
  33. Social Impacts of Information Technologies on Rural North America."
  34. (1976). Social Work in Rural Communities.
  35. (1989). Superintendent of Documents,
  36. (1987). Technology, Costs, and the New Economics of Statistics."
  37. (1977). The Changing Shape of Metropolitan America: Commuting Patterns, Urban Fields, and Decentralization Processes.
  38. (1986). The Future of Farming in the South."
  39. (1987). The Politics of Printouts: the Use of Official Numbers to Allocate Federal Grants-in-Aid."
  40. (1988). The Rise of Poverty in Rural America."
  41. (1990). The Rural Community: Social Structure and Population."
  42. (1987). The Sociology of Official Statistics." Pp. 7-58 in The Politics of
  43. (1983). The Sociology of Southern Appalachia."
  44. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged." Chicago:
  45. (1989). Two Sides to the Sunbelt: The Growing Divergence Between the Rural and Urban South.
  46. Unions: Their Effect on California Farm Wages."