Article thumbnail

Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders

By Giovanni Cespa and Giacinta Cestone

Abstract

We argue that when stakeholder protection is left to the voluntary initiative of managers, concessions to social activists and pressure groups can turn into a self-entrenchment strategy for incumbent CEOs. Stakeholders other than shareholders thus benefit from corporate governance rules putting managers under a tough replacement threat. We show that a minimal amount of formal stakeholder protection, or the introduction of explicit covenants protecting stakeholder rights in the firm charter, may deprive CEOs of the alliance with powerful social activists, thus increasing managerial turnover and shareholder value. These results rationalize a recent trend whereby well-known social activists like Friends of the Earth and active shareholders like CalPERS are showing a growing support for each other's agendas.corporate governance, managerial entrenchment, social activists, small shareholders, stakeholder society

OAI identifier: oai:RePEc:aub:autbar:528.02

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles