Article thumbnail

The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?

By Grant E. Isaac

Abstract

International policy coordination is a challenging exercise requiring policy rapprochement among sovereign nations that often have very different political economy situations. Successful efforts may even result in the creation of multilateral paradigms such as trade agreements or multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs). Typically, there is overlap between these independent paradigms; sometimes in the nexus there is policy coordination and other times there is conflict. An understanding of the factors that account for coordination and conflict is crucial in ensuring that any benefits from policy coordination that may be achieved in one paradigm are not eroded through conflicts with another paradigm. This article presents a case study of the implications of overlapping multilateral paradigms – the World Trade Organization and an MEA known as the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety – for international market access of biotechnology-based agri-food products.Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from http://purl.umn.edu/45734

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). Agricultural Biotechnology and Transatlantic Trade: Regulatory Barriers to GM Crops.
  2. (2001). Economic Analysis for International Trade Negotiations: The WTO and Agricultural Trade.
  3. (2000). Economic Theories of International Environmental Cooperation.
  4. (2003). Genetically Modified Organisms and Trade Rules: Identifying Important Challenges for the WTO. The World Economy
  5. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order.
  6. (2001). Organization, Committee on Trade and the Environment.
  7. (2000). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy.
  8. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.