Article thumbnail

Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act

By Sean B. Cash, David L. Sunding, Aaron Swoboda and David Zilberman

Abstract

A driving factor behind pesticide regulation in Canada and the United States is the desire to protect consumers from harmful residues on food. The Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) was unanimously passed by the U.S. Congress in 1996 and hailed as a landmark piece of pesticide legislation. It amended the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), and focused on new ways to determine and mitigate the adverse health effects of pesticides. The FQPA is different from past legislation; it is based on the understanding that pesticides can have cumulative effects on people and that policy should be designed to protect the most vulnerable segments of the population. Recent research has investigated some of the impacts the FQPA’s provisions – many of which have yet to be fully implemented – may have on growers and consumers.Agricultural and Food Policy,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from http://purl.umn.edu/45730

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs.
  2. (2003). Essays on the economics of protecting health and the environment.
  3. (1998). Golden age of insecticide research: past, present, or future?
  4. (1997). Goodbye pesticides? The food quality protection act of
  5. (1996). House of Representatives.
  6. (1993). Pesticides in the diets of infants and children.
  7. (2001). Summary of FQPA amendments to FIFRA and FFDCA. USEPA Web site, http://www.epa.gov/opppsps1/fqpa/fqpa-iss.htm (accessed
  8. (1995). The causes and prevention of cancer.
  9. (2002). The economic importance of organophosphates in California agriculture. Report prepared for the California Department of Food and Agriculture by the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,
  10. (1996). When is a life too costly to save? The evidence from U.S. environmental regulations.