Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Does Gibrat's law hold amongst dairy farmers in Northern Ireland?

By Phillip Kostov, Myles Patton, Joan Moss and Seamus McErlean

Abstract

We introduce a new hybrid approach to joint estimation of Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) for high quantiles of return distributions. We investigate the relative performance of VaR and ES models using daily returns for sixteen stock market indices (eight from developed and eight from emerging markets) prior to and during the 2008 financial crisis. In addition to widely used VaR and ES models, we also study the behavior of conditional and unconditional extreme value (EV) models to generate 99 percent confidence level estimates as well as developing a new loss function that relates tail losses to ES forecasts. Backtesting results show that only our proposed new hybrid and Extreme Value (EV)-based VaR models provide adequate protection in both developed and emerging markets, but that the hybrid approach does this at a significantly lower cost in capital reserves. In ES estimation the hybrid model yields the smallest error statistics surpassing even the EV models, especially in the developed markets

Topics: G300
Publisher: Philip Kostov
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:clok.uclan.ac.uk:1415
Provided by: CLoK

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). A consistent nonparametric test of parametric regression models under conditioning quantile restrictions. doi
  2. (2003). Agriculture on the move: exploring regional differences in farm exit rates. doi
  3. (2002). Analysis of farm development in Dutch agriculture and horticulture.
  4. (1997). Asymptotic theory of integrated conditional moment tests.
  5. (2000). Conditional extremes and near-extremes,
  6. (2000). Conditional extremes and near-extremes: concepts, asymptotic theory and economic applications, unpublished PhD Dissertation,
  7. (2001). Conditional value-at-risk: aspects of modeling and estimation.
  8. (2003). Does Gibrat's Law hold among young, small firms?. doi
  9. (1999). Family farm dynamics in Canada and Israel: the case of farm exits. doi
  10. (1999). Farm growth and survival: econometric evidence for individual farms in Upper Austria. doi
  11. (1987). Farm size and growth in Canada. doi
  12. (1992). Farm size structure in England and Wales 1939-89.
  13. (2002). Firm size and growth in the UK life insurance industry. doi
  14. (1997). Gibrat’s Legacy.
  15. (2003). Government payments and structural change in agriculture.
  16. (2000). Inference on the quantile regression process. doi
  17. (2001). Integrated conditional moment testing of quantile regression models.
  18. (2004). Investigating the determinants of farm growth and survival, Paper presented at the AES annual conference,
  19. (1931). Les Inegalites Economiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey.
  20. (1981). Martingale approach in the theory of goodness-of-fit tests. doi
  21. (2003). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AAEA,
  22. (2002). Quantile models and estimators for data analysis, doi
  23. (2001). Quantile regression with sample selection: estimating women's return to education in the U.S..
  24. (1978). Regression quantiles. doi
  25. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. doi
  26. (1982). Seller concentration: the technological explanation and demand uncertainty.
  27. (1998). Size, growth, and survival in the upper Austrian farm sector.
  28. (1974). Solution of an overdetermined system of equations in the L1 norm.
  29. (1998). The dynamics of changes in the female wage distribution in the USA: a quantile regression approach.
  30. (1987). The growth of farms. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.