Article thumbnail


By C-Rene Dominique


This note takes a retrospective look at the Utility Construct still in use in economic science and compares it to a new approach based on recent findings in neuroscience. The results show that it is more natural and more compelling to go from the preference order to the price vector. Thus making the non-falsifiable utility apparatus superfluous.Well-ordered Preference Relation, C2 Utility Function, Well-defined Individual Demand Function, and Neuroeconomics

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1971). A Condition for the Completeness of
  2. (2005). A Neuroscientific Approach to Consciousness.”
  3. (1964). Continuity Properties of Paretian Utility.”
  4. (1974). Core and Equilibria of a Large Economy.
  5. (1896). Cours d’économie Politique.
  6. (1971). Demand Theory Without Transitive Preferences.” In
  7. (2006). Explaining the Logic of Pure Preference in a Neurodynamic Structure.”
  8. (2007). How Does Consciousness Happen?” Scientific Amer.
  9. (1985). Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of
  10. (2005). Identification of Network Level Coding Units for Real-Time Representation of Episodic Experience
  11. (1960). Mathematical Methods in Social Sciences. Stanford:
  12. (2006). Organizing Principles of Real-Time Memory Encoding.”
  13. (1972). Representation of Preference Ordering With Independent Components of Consumption.”
  14. (1976). Smooth Preferences.
  15. (1975). Structural Stability and Morphogenesis.
  16. (1963). The Existence of a Utility Function to Represent Preferences.”
  17. (1965). The Relationship Between Transitive Preference and the
  18. (1959). Theory of Value.
  19. (1960). Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory” in
  20. (1999). Unfettered Globalization.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.