Article thumbnail

Debt Financing and Financial Flexibility Evidence from Pro-active Leverage Increases

By David J. Denis and Stephen B. Mckeon

Abstract

Firms that intentionally increase leverage through substantial debt issuances do so primarily as a response to operating needs rather than a desire to make a large equity payout. Subsequent debt reductions are neither rapid, nor the result of pro-active attempts to rebalance the firm’s capital structure towards a long-run target. Instead, the evolution of the firm’s leverage ratio depends primarily on whether or not the firm produces a financial surplus. In fact, firms that generate subsequent deficits tend to cover these deficits predominantly with more debt even though they exhibit leverage ratios that are well above estimated target levels. While many of our findings are difficult to reconcile with traditional capital structure models, they are broadly consistent with a capital structure theory in which financial flexibility, in the form of unused debt capacity, plays an important role in capital structure choices.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.
  2. (1994). Accounting choice in troubled companies.
  3. (2008). Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the CrossSection of Corporate Capital Structures,
  4. (2009). Bank Lines of Credit in Corporate Finance: An Empirical Analysis.
  5. (2008). Can Real Options Explain Financing Behavior?
  6. (2009). Capital Structure and Large Investment Projects
  7. (2009). Capital Structure Decisions: Which Factors are Reliably Important?
  8. (2007). Capital Structure, Payout Policy, and Financial Flexibility.
  9. (1984). Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have.
  10. (1990). Dividend Policy and Financial Distress: An Empirical Investigation of Troubled NYSE Firms.
  11. (2009). Do firms have leverage targets? Evidence from acquisitions.
  12. (2005). Do Firms Rebalance Their Capital Structures?
  13. (2007). Do Tests of Capital Structure Theory Mean What They Say?
  14. (1989). Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Tests.
  15. (1990). Effectiveness of Accounting-Based Dividend Covenants.
  16. (2009). Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches,
  17. (2005). Financing decisions: who issues stock?
  18. (2007). Firms' histories and their capital structures.
  19. (2008). How and When Do Firms Adjust Their Capital Structures Toward Targets?
  20. (2000). How big are the tax benefits of debt?
  21. (1998). How costly is financial (not economic) distress? Evidence from highly leveraged transactions that became distressed.
  22. (1993). Managerial discretion, organizational structure, and corporate performance: A study of leveraged recapitalizations.
  23. (2002). Market timing and capital structure.
  24. (2006). Partial adjustment toward target capital structures.
  25. (2010). Reconciling Estimates of the Speed of Adjustment of Leverage Ratios
  26. (2010). Seasoned equity offerings, market timing, and the corporate lifecycle.
  27. (2008). Sources of Financial Flexibility: Evidence from Cash Flow Shortfalls, Working Paper,
  28. (2009). Target Behavior and Financing: How Conclusive is the Evidence?
  29. (2010). Testing Theories of Capital Structure and Estimating the Speed of Adjustment.
  30. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle.
  31. (2004). The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme.
  32. (2007). The Risk-Adjusted Cost of Financial Distress.
  33. (2004). The Role of Target Leverage in Security Issues and Repurchases.
  34. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.