Location of Repository

Tool use and related errors in ideational apraxia: The quantitative simulation of patient error profiles

By Richard P. Cooper

Abstract

The behaviour of ideational apraxic patients on simple tasks involving multiple objects is typically marked by a variety of errors. While some of these errors concern the sequential organisation of action through time, many relate to the misuse of, or failure to use, necessary or appropriate tools. In this paper we apply the computational model of Cooper & Shallice (2000) to five standard multiple object tasks used in clinical assessment and demonstrate how, when lesioned, the model can account for the error profiles of two ideational apraxic patients discussed by Rumiati et al. (2001). Application of the model to the multiple object tasks demonstrates the generality of the model, while the account of the error profiles extends previous work (Cooper et al., 2005) in which ideational apraxia was argued to arise from a generalised disturbance of object representations that are held to trigger action schemas

Topics: psyc
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:565

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1997). Modeling visuomotor transformations.
  2. (2002). Utilisation behaviour consequent to bilateral SMA softening. doi
  3. (2004). Ideational apraxia and naturalistic action. doi
  4. (2005). The simulation of action disorganisation in complex activities of daily living. doi
  5. (2000). Contention Scheduling and the control of routine activities. doi
  6. (1991). Rightsided anarchic (alien) hand: A longitudinal study. doi
  7. (1984). Selective attention and the organisation of visual information. doi
  8. (1986). Disorganization of behaviour after frontal lobe damage. doi
  9. (2002). Dissociations in routine behaviour across patients and everyday tasks. doi
  10. (1989). The Prefrontal Cortex. doi
  11. (1979). Simulating Errors of Tool Use GIBSON JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception.
  12. (2002). Naturalistic action impairments in dementia. doi
  13. (1981). actions, and mental sets: Managerial Knowledge Units in the frontal lobes.
  14. (1989). Integrating Theory and Practice in Neuropsychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, doi
  15. (2005). It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: The neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices. doi
  16. (2003). From vision to action and action to vision: A convergent route approach to vision, action, and attention. doi
  17. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. doi
  18. (1983). Utilisation behaviour and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. doi
  19. (1920). Ergebnisse der doi
  20. (1985). A theory of the representation, organisation and timing of action with implications for sequencing disorders. In Roy EA (Ed) Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders.
  21. (1989). How to do the right thing. doi
  22. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. doi
  23. (1980). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. Chip report 99,
  24. (1986). Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour.
  25. (1905). Studien uber Motorische Apraxie und ihr Nahestehende Erscheinungen; ihre Bedeutung in der Symptomatologie Psychoopathischer Symptomen-Komplexe. doi
  26. (1979). Actions not as planned: The price of automatization.
  27. (1998). Recognition by action: Dissociating visual and semantic routes to actions in normal observers. doi
  28. (2004). Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects. doi
  29. (2001). A form of ideational apraxia as a selective deficit of contention scheduling. doi
  30. (1999). Naturalistic action production following right hemisphere stroke. doi
  31. (1998). Naturalistic action impairment in Closed Head Injury. doi
  32. (1991). The quantitative description of action disorganisation after brain damage: A case study. doi
  33. (1989). The origins of utilisation behaviour. doi
  34. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. doi
  35. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. doi
  36. (1994). Simulating Errors of Tool Use
  37. (2001). Attending to the parts of a single object: part-based selection limitations. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.