Further Results on Planning Horizons in the Production Smoothing Problem


A generalized version of the Modigliani-Hohn production smoothing model is analyzed, and two types or classes of theorem are proved. (Theorems 1 and 2): The planning horizon (defined as a minimal interval of sufficient length to yield optimal current decisions) depends critically on the existence of "bottleneck" conditions; in the case of the original M-H model, a bottleneck arises out of the inventory nonnegativity constraint, and it is here shown that an additional interesting bottleneck condition arises out of an inventory storage capacity constraint. Whether a particular type of bottleneck defines a horizon will depend, interestingly, on the terminal inventory condition that is imposed for the original optimization process. (Theorems 3 and 4): The sensitivity of horizon length to two economic parameters, the discount factor and the marginal storage cost, will depend on whether the horizon-determining bottleneck is due to a binding inventory capacity constraint, or a binding nonnegativity constraint. The capacity constraint will yield "perverse" horizon sensitivities first noted by Charnes, Dreze and Miller [Charnes, Abraham, Drèze, Jaques, Miller, Merton. 1966. Decision and horizon rules for stochastic planning problems: a linear example. Econometrica 34 307-330.] in their work on the warehousing problem. In light of these results, the importance of horizons as a programming concept can be questioned.

Similar works

Full text


Research Papers in Economics

Provided original full text link
Last time updated on 7/6/2012

This paper was published in Research Papers in Economics.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.