Article thumbnail

Advances in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health Interventions

By Alan M. Garber

Abstract

The growing application of cost-effectiveness (CE) analysis and controversies about its methods has led to a need to explore its welfare economic foundations. Examination of its welfare theoretic foundations can provide a rationale for selecting specific standards for the application of CE analysis while deepening our understanding of the implications of alternative methodological approaches. In this paper, I explore conditions under which decision making based on CE analysis, carried out a specific way, leads to a distribution of resources that has desirable social welfare properties. The first section describes the basics of CE analysis and how it can be applied to aid decisions about the allocation of health resources. The paper then turns to the potential welfare economic foundations of CE analysis, and addresses specific issues in carrying out CE analysis, such as which costs to include, whose perspective matters in the analysis, and how health outcomes are measured. It demonstrates how a welfare economic foundation can help resolve ambiguities and uncertainties about the application of CE analysis. The paper also discusses the limitations of such an approach, which indeed reflect limitations of CE analysis as an analytic framework. Finally, it addresses unresolved issues such as the difficulties in using the results of CE analysis to make health policy at the societal or group level.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1971). A Theory of Justice
  2. (1997). Accounting for future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysis,”
  3. (1995). Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator as compared with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction,” New England
  4. (1999). Cost-effectiveness of alternative test strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease,”
  5. (1994). Cost-effectiveness ratios: in a league of their own,”
  6. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives
  7. (1992). Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis,”
  8. (1996). Estimating costs in costeffectiveness analysis,”
  9. (1977). Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices,”
  10. (1993). Handbook of Health Economics (North Holland,
  11. (1993). Healthy-years equivalents versus quality-adjusted life years: in pursuit of progress,”
  12. (1994). In search of power and significance: issues in the design and analysis of stochastic cost-effectiveness studies in health care,”
  13. (1986). Is Prevention Better than Cure? (The Brookings Institution,
  14. (1987). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
  15. (1980). Office of Technology Assessment
  16. (1991). On the (near) equivalence of cost effectiveness and cost benefit analysis,”
  17. (1993). On the decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis,”
  18. (1997). On valuing morbidity, cost-effectiveness analysis, and being rude,”
  19. (1997). QALYs and HYEs (healthy years equivalent). Spotting the differences,”
  20. (1989). Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents,”
  21. (1996). Reporting cost-effectiveness studies and results,”
  22. (1995). Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: a review of published studies,”
  23. (1988). Symptom status and quality of life following prostatectomy,”
  24. (1996). The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis,”
  25. (1982). The distinction between cost and charges,”
  26. (1968). The economics of moral hazard:
  27. (1999). The Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life for Use in Resource Allocation Decisions in Health Care,”
  28. (1999). The normative economics of the health sector,”
  29. (1994). Uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care technologies: the role of sensitivity analysis,”
  30. (1995). Valuing health care benefits in money terms,”
  31. (1988). Watchful waiting vs immediate transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatism. The importance of patients' preferences,”
  32. (1939). Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility,”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.