Article thumbnail

Identifying Effective Classroom Practices Using Student Achievement Data

By Thomas J. Kane, Eric S. Taylor, John H. Tyler and Amy L. Wooten

Abstract

Recent research has confirmed both the importance of teachers in producing student achievement growth and in the variability across teachers in the ability to do that. Such findings raise the stakes on our ability to identify effective teachers and teaching practices. This paper combines information from classroom-based observations and measures of teachers’ ability to improve student achievement as a step toward addressing these challenges. We find that classroom based measures of teaching effectiveness are related in substantial ways to student achievement growth. Our results point to the promise of teacher evaluation systems that would use information from both classroom observations and student test scores to identify effective teachers. Our results also offer information on the types of practices that are most effective at raising achievement.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools. R-2007-LAUSD.
  2. (2003). Criterion-related validity evidence for a standards-based teacher evaluation system,”
  3. (1996). Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future
  4. (2009). Does student sorting invalidate value-added models of teacher effectiveness? An extended analysis of the Rothstein critique.” University of Missouri working paper,
  5. (2005). Eric Hanushek and
  6. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation.” NBER working paper #14601,
  7. (2003). Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability.
  8. (2003). Handbook on Teacher Evalution: Assessing and Improving Performance.
  9. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods,
  10. (2006). Identifying Effective Teachers Using Performance on the Job” Hamilton Project Discussion Paper, Published by the Brookings Institution.
  11. (2009). Measure for Measure: A Pilot Study Linking English Language Arts Instruction and Teachers’ Value-Added to Student Achievement.” Working paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of The American Education Finance Association,
  12. (1984). Measurement-Based Evaluation of Teacher Performance: An Empirical Approach.
  13. (2009). Methods of evaluating teacher effectiveness.
  14. (2004). Models for Value-Added Modeling of Teacher Effects”
  15. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement,”
  16. (2008). Principals as agents: Subjective performance measurement in education”
  17. (2009). Providing information on teacher performance to school principals: Evidence from a randomized intervention in
  18. (2004). Relationships among dimension scores of standards-based teacher evaluation systems, and the stability of evaluation score—student achievement relationships over time,” Consortium for Policy Research in Education-
  19. (2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education” in Education Sector Reports,
  20. (2009). So long, Lake Wobegon? Using teacher evaluation to raise teacher quality.
  21. (2009). Subjective and objective evaluations of teacher effectiveness.”
  22. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement; estimation using micro data”.
  23. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice.
  24. (2009). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement,” Forthcoming Quarterly Journal of Economics.
  25. (2003). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago Public Schools” (No. WP-2002-28). Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
  26. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: evidence from panel data,”
  27. (2008). The persistence of teacher-induced learning gains,” NBER working paper #14065,
  28. (2004). The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati”
  29. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on teacher effectiveness.
  30. (2007). Tough Liberal: Albert Shanker and the Battles Over Schools, Unions, Race, and Democracy.
  31. (2004). What are value-added models estimating and what does this imply for statistical practice?”
  32. (1981). What do effective teachers of inner-city children have
  33. (2006). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City.” NBER working paper #12155,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.