Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Consumption and Income Poverty over the Business Cycle

By Bruce D. Meyer and James X. Sullivan


We examine the relationship between the business cycle and poverty for the period from 1960 to 2008 using income data from the Current Population Survey and consumption data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey. This new evidence on the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and poverty is of particular interest given recent changes in anti-poverty policies that have placed greater emphasis on participation in the labor market and in-kind transfers. We look beyond official poverty, examining alternative income poverty and consumption poverty, which have conceptual and empirical advantages as measures of the well-being of the poor. We find that both income and consumption poverty are sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. A one percentage point increase in unemployment is associated with an increase in the after-tax income poverty rate of 0.9 to 1.1 percentage points in the long-run, and an increase in the consumption poverty rate of 0.3 to 1.2 percentage points in the long-run. The evidence on whether income is more responsive to the business cycle than consumption is mixed. Income poverty does appear to be more responsive using national level variation, but consumption poverty is often more responsive to unemployment when using regional variation. Low percentiles of both income and consumption are sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, and in most cases low percentiles of income appear to be more responsive than low percentiles of consumption.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. 10. At Slesnick, Daniel T.
  2. (2008). 18 State taxes and credits are also calculated using TAXSIM for the years 1977-2008. Prior to 1977 we calculate state taxes using IncTaxCalc (Bakija,
  3. (1962). An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Test for Aggregation Bias”,
  4. (1993). An Introduction to the TAXSIM Model",
  5. (2008). Changes in the Consumption, Income,
  6. (2001). Consumption and Social Welfare. Cambridge:
  7. (2008). Documentation for a Comprehensive Historical U.S. Federal and State Income Tax Calculator Program.” Williams College working paper,
  8. (2009). Economic change and the structure of opportunity for low skill Workers.” In Changing Poverty, Changing Policy, edited by Maria Cancian and Sheldon Danziger.
  9. (2000). Fighting Poverty: Lessons from Recent U.S.
  10. (2007). Further Results on Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption,”
  11. (2000). Has Macroeconomic Performance Regained Its Antipoverty
  12. (1984). Macroeconomic Conditions, Income Transfers, and the Trend in Poverty,”
  13. (1997). Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work,
  14. (1995). Measuring Poverty: A New Approach,
  15. (2003). Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and
  16. (2004). Poverty and Macroeconomic Performance across Space, Race, and Family Structure,” Demography,
  17. (1994). Poverty in Relation to Macroeconomic Trends, Cycles, and Policies.”
  18. (2009). Simulating the Effect of the “Great Recession” on Poverty.
  19. (2001). The Rising Tide Lifts…?” In
  20. (1993). Why Were Poverty Rates So High

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.