Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

What Will Technology Do to Financial Structure?

By Fredric S. Mishkin and Philip E. Strahan


This paper looks at how advances in information and telecommunications technologies have been changing the structure of the financial system by lowering transaction costs and reducing asymmetric information. Households and smaller businesses can now raise funds in securities markets as financial institutions have become better at unbundling risks while financial products can be distributed more efficiently through electronic networks. These changes have reduced the role of traditional financial intermediaries overall efficiency by lowering the costs of financial contracting. Despite these benefits technological progress presents policymakers with some important challenges. First markets for financial products become larger and more contestable, defining geographic and product markets narrowly becomes more problematic. Second, financial consolidation and the trend towards new activities of financial intermediaries require the exploration of new methods to preserve the safety and soundness of the financial system. A combined system of vigilant supervision and constructive ambiguity to deal with failures of larger institutions should be capable of mitigating the potential for increased risk-taking and help preserve the health of the financial system.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). Bank Lending to Small Businesses and the Use of CRA Loan Data to Measure Market Structure,” Federal Reserve Board working paper.
  2. (1996). Bank Mergers and Industrywide Structure, 1980-94,” Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, staff study no.
  3. (1998). Bank Mergers: Creating Value or Destroying Competition?” Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Financial Industry Issues, third quarter.
  4. (1998). Entry Restrictions, Industry Evolution and Dynamic Efficiency: Evidence from Commercial Banking,
  5. (1995). Executive Pay and Performance: Evidence from the U.S. Banking Industry,”
  6. (1997). Industry Structure: Electronic Delivery’s Potential Effects on Retail Banking,”
  7. (1997). Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences in
  8. (1997). Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences in the Efficiencies of Financial Institutions?,
  9. (1992). Market Structure and the Nature of Price Rigidity: Evidence from the Market for Consumer deposits,
  10. (1997). Market Structure and the Speed of Price Adjustments:
  11. (1998). Recent Trends in the Size Distribution of Household Wealth,”
  12. (1988). Reevaluation of the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm in
  13. (1995). The Decline of Traditional Banking: Implications for Financial Stability and Regulatory Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review
  14. (1998). The Determinants of Corporate Loan Liquidity,” mimeo,
  15. (1993). The Efficiency of Financial Institutions: A Review and
  16. (1993). The Efficiency of Financial27 Institutions: A Review and Preview of Research Past, Present and Future,”
  17. (1970). The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,”
  18. (1996). The Political Economy of Branching Restrictions and Deposit Insurance:
  19. (1997). The Political Economy of Deregulation: Evidence from the Relaxation of Bank Branching Restrictions in the United States,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, research paper no.
  20. (1989). The Price-Concentration Relationship in Banking,
  21. (1991). The Rigidity of Prices: Evidence from the Banking Industry,
  22. (1997). What’s the Point of Credit Scoring?” Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review September/October,
  23. (1997). Why is the Banking Sector Shrinking? Core Deposits and Relationship Lending,” mimeo,
  24. (1996). Would Credit Scoring Backfire in a Recession?” American Banker

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.