Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Measuring social segregation between London’s secondary schools, 2003 – 2008/9

By Richard Harris

Abstract

Segregation is a spatial outcome of spatial processes that therefore needs to be measured spatially. This is the axiom from which local indices of segregation are developed and applied to the local markets within which schools compete. The indices are used to measure patterns of social segregation between London’s state-funded secondary schools, education authorities, types of selecting and non-selecting schools, and, longitudinally, for cohorts of pupils entering the schools in each of the years from 2003 to 2008. The paper finds sizeable differences between apparently competing schools in the proportions of free school meal eligible pupils they recruit, with selective schools especially and also faith schools under-recruiting such pupils. Whilst there is some evidence that differences between schools have decreased over the period, the trend is considered to be an artefact of using free school meals as a measure of disadvantage, a measure that the paper ultimately questions.segregation, index, secondary schools, selective schools, faith schools, London

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1954). A Probability Model for the Measurement of Ecological Segregation.
  2. (2004). A response to Gorard on social segregation.
  3. (2007). Allocating Pupils to their Nearest Secondary Schools: the Consequences for Social and Ability Stratification.
  4. (1996). Area Cartograms: their use and creation
  5. (2004). Comments on “Modelling Social Segregation” by Goldstein and Noden.
  6. (2011). Does Segregation Matter? In In
  7. (2009). Does the index of segregation matter? The composition of secondary schools in England since
  8. (1959). Ethnic segregation and assimilation.
  9. (2011). Evaluating Changing Residential Segregation in Auckland, New Zealand, Using Spatial Statistics. Tijdschrift voor Economische en
  10. (2007). Finding Space and Managing Distance: Public School Choice in an Urban California District. Urban Studies,
  11. (2000). Here we go again: a reply to “What”s in a number?’ by Gibson and Asthana.
  12. (2008). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  13. (2008). Is free-meal entitlement a valid measure of school intake characteristics?
  14. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association - LISA.
  15. (2010). Measuring segregation - a cautionary tale.
  16. (2011). Measuring segregation—beware of the cautionary tale by Johnston and Jones. Environment and Planning
  17. (2011). Measuring segregation? A geographical tale. Environment and Planning A,
  18. (2003). Modelling Social Segregation.
  19. (2010). Multilvel modelling of social segregation.
  20. (1955). Occupational stratification and residential distribution.
  21. (2011). Segregation by choice? Social and ethnic differences between English schools. In
  22. (2010). Segregation by poverty in secondary schools in England 2006-2009: a research note.
  23. (1949). The Social Areas of Los Angeles: Analysis and Typology. California:
  24. (2008). The,
  25. (2007). What does an index of school segregation measure? A commentary on Allen and Vignoles. Oxford Review of Education,
  26. (2007). What Should an Index of School Segregation Measure? Oxford Review of Education,
  27. (2010). Worlds Apart: social variation among schools, London: The Sutton Trust.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.