Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Do Currency Regime and Developmental Stage Matter for Real Exchange Rate Volatility? A Cross-Country Analysis

By Monzur Hossain


This paper analyzes real effective exchange rate (REER) volatility of 18 countries for the post-Bretton Woods period (1973-2004) under the Markov chain model framework. The findings can be summarized as follows: (i) flexible regimes induce higher short-term volatility; (ii) neither currency regime nor developmental stage is found to induce long-term real volatility; and (iii) flexible regimes and lower level of development can help adjust to long-term real shocks. Further investigation suggests that less developed economies adjust to long-term real shocks by deviating from their de jure exchange rate regime. Moreover, estimated steady state probability suggests that REER exhibits more stability in the long run, and it takes around 20 months to converge to equilibrium. In other words, this finding provides an explanation to purchasing power parity (PPP) in relative terms.Currency regime, Developmental stage, Real exchange rate volatility

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1993). A first course in stochastic processes”, 2nd ed..
  2. (2005). Aggregation Bias" DOES Explain the PPP Puzzle,"
  3. (1996). Are exchange rates excessively volatile? And what does "excessively volatile" mean, anyway?” Research Paper 9601, Federal Reserve Bank of
  4. (2002). Classifying exchange rate regimes: Deeds versus words. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Available via the internet at: 24 _______________________
  5. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends”?
  6. (2005). Does 'Aggregation Bias' Explain The Ppp Puzzle?" Pacific Economic Review,
  7. (1998). Effective real exchange rates and irrelevant nominal exchange rate regimes”, Research Discussion Paper 9811, Reserve Bank of Australia
  8. (1985). Effects of exchange rate volatility on trade”.
  9. (1995). Empirical research on nominal exchange rates,
  10. (1983). Empirical tests of the monetary approach to exchange rate determination”.
  11. (2002). Exchange rate pass through, exchange rate volatility and exchange rate disconnect”,
  12. (2005). Exchange rate volatility and the United States exports: evidence from Canada and Japan”,
  13. (2000). Exchange rate volatility, Trade, and Capital flows under alternative exchange rate regimes.
  14. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”.
  15. (1991). Long swings in the dollar: Are they in the data and do markets know it”?
  16. (1995). Multi state Markov models and diabetic retinopathy”.
  17. (1986). Nominal exchange rate regimes and the behavior of real exchange rates: Evidence and implications”.
  18. (1991). Nominal exchange rate regimes and the real exchange rate: Evidence from the United States and Britain,
  19. (1996). Perspectives on PPP and Long Run Real Exchange Rates," NBER Working Papers 4952,
  20. (2003). Predicting emerging market currency crashes”.
  21. (2002). Purchasing power parity and the real exchange rate”.
  22. (2000). Real effective exchange rate and the constant elasticity of substitution Assumption”.
  23. (2001). Real exchange rate tends in transitional countries”,
  24. (2002). Real Exchange Rate Volatility and Economic Openness: Theory and Evidence,"
  25. (1998). Real exchange rate volatility: Does nominal exchange rate regime matter”? IMF Working Paper,
  26. (1997). Real exchange rates and macroeconomics: evidence and theory”,
  27. (2000). Short run dynamics of real exchange rates”.
  28. (2003). The effect of exchange rate regimes on real exchange rate volatility A dynamic panel data approach”, paper presented at the 31 st Brazilian Economics meeting,
  29. (1981). The monetary approach to exchange rate in an efficient foreign exchange market: Tests based on volatility”.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.