Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Child Labor and the Labor Supply of Other Household Members: Evidence from 1920 America

By Marco Manacorda

Abstract

This paper analyses the effect of child labor on household labor supply using 1920 US Census micro data. The aim of the analysis is to understand who in the household benefits from child labor. In order to identify a source of exogenous variation in child labor I use State-specific child labor laws. I find that a rise in the proportion of working children by household is associated with no variation in parents¿ labor supply. I also find a strong negative externality among children: as the proportion of working children by household rises, everything else equal, the probability that each child works falls while the probability that he attends school rises. This suggests that parents redistribute entirely the returns from child labor to the children in the household, consistent with a model of household labor supply with fully altruistic parents.Child labor, child labor laws, household labor supply

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1981). A Treatise on the Family,
  2. (1998). America’s Graduation from High School: The Evolution and Spread of Secondary Schooling in the Twentieth Century’,
  3. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of
  4. (1974). Child-Labor Legislation and the Labor Force Participation of Children‘,
  5. (1992). Collective Labor Supply and Welfare’,
  6. (1996). Compulsory Schooling Legislation and School Attendance in Turn-of-the-Century America: A "Natural Experiment"
  7. (1972). Compulsory Schooling Legislation: An Economic Analysis of Law and
  8. (1970). Crusade for the children : a history of the National Child Labor Committee and child labor reform in America, Quadrangle Books,
  9. (2000). Does Unemployment Insurance Crowd out Spousal Labor Supply?’,
  10. (1980). Economics and Consumer Behavior,
  11. (1999). Egalitarianism and the Returns to Education during the Great Transformation of American Education’,
  12. (1997). Fumio Hayashi and Laurence Kotlikoff
  13. (2000). How Large Are Human Capital Externalities?, Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws’,
  14. (1990). Intra-Household Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach’, The Journal of Human Resources (in
  15. (2000). Is Child Labor Inefficient?’,
  16. (1996). Labor Markets in the Twentieth Century’,
  17. (1994). Like Father, like Son; Like Mother, like Daughter: Parental Resources and Child Height‘,
  18. (1989). Parental Altruism and Self-Interest: Child Labor Among late
  19. (1992). School Quality and Black-White Relative Earnings: A Direct Assessment‘,
  20. (1996). Technology, Skill, and the Wage Structure: Insights from the Past’,
  21. (1985). The Added Worker Effect‘,
  22. (2002). The Effects of Risk on Education and Child Labour’, IFS Working Paper W02/07,
  23. (1974). The Estimation of Income and Substitution Effects in a Model of Family Labor Supply‘,
  24. (1973). The Intrafamily Allocation of Time:
  25. (1980). Unemployment as Disequilibrium in a Model of Aggregate Labor Supply‘,
  26. (2002). Were Compulsory Attendance and Child Labor Laws Effective?: An Analysis from 1915 to 1939‘,
  27. (2003). Why Does Financial Development Matter? The United States from 1900 to 1940‘, NBER Working Paper No 9551,
  28. (1997). Why the United States Led in Education: Lessons from Secondary School Expansion,
  29. (1982). Women, Children, and Industrialization in the Early Republic: Evidence from the Manufacturing Censuses‘,
  30. (2002). Worker Displacement and the Added Worker Effect’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.