Location of Repository

Online self‐assessment materials: Do these make a difference to student learning?

By Mary Peat

Abstract

During the last decade the teaching of students in first‐year biology has changed from a teacher‐centred focus to a student‐centred focus. The change was designed to encourage students to take responsibility for their learning, develop team and communication skills and put in practice those skills required for lifelong learning. Students are introduced to small learning communities (in large classes) that give the students a sense of belonging and a peer support group. Activities have been devised and implemented to support student‐centred learning, which in more recent years has included using computers. All these activities are integrated into the course design so that the students are offered an array of learning opportunities relevant to the course(s) learning outcomes. An important requirement for the development of student‐centred learning is suitable and timely feedback that gives students guidance about their learning outcomes. Giving feedback to very large classes is an expensive commodity and one that is vulnerable in the current climate of reducing resources and increasing student numbers. First‐year biology students receive online feedback from a weekly quiz (with both formative and summative components), from a mid‐semester mock exam (formative only) and from a series of self‐assessment modules (formative only). This paper will examine the use of such online self‐assessment in a large first‐year biology class, discuss current evaluations of the materials and propose further research into how students use these integrated learning opportunities

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: University of Wales Press
Year: 2000
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776000080206
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:331/core5

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1997). A study in self-assessment: tutor and students' perceptions of performance criteria'. doi
  2. (1989). An experiment in student self-assessment', doi
  3. (1995). Analysis of peer-, self- and staffassessment in group project work', doi
  4. (1995). First-year on Campus: Diversity in the Initial Experiences of Australian Undergraduates, Centre for the Study of Higher Education,
  5. (1987). Grade level differences in students' study activities as a function of course characteristics', doi
  6. (1997). Learning styles and courseware design', doi
  7. (1992). Learning to Teach doi
  8. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities', doi
  9. (1999). Refining assessment for resource based learning', doi
  10. (1993). Self-assessment as a generic skill for enterprising students: the learning process', doi
  11. (1997). The development of self-assessment modules: use of tailor-made templates',
  12. (1998). The mass implementation and evaluation of computerbased assessments', doi
  13. (1993). The progress of open learning', doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.