Location of Repository

Entrepreneurial Ventures and the Developmental State: Lessons from the Advanced Economies

By William Lazonick

Abstract

A basic intellectual challenge for those concerned with the poverty of nations is to come to grips with the nature and causes of the wealth of the world?s wealthier nations. One might then be in a position to inform the poorer nations how they might achieve similar outcomes. This paper is organized around what I call ?the theory of innovative enterprise?, a perspective derived from the historical and comparative study of the development of the advanced economies. The theory of innovative enterprise provides the essential analytical link between entrepreneurship and development. Section 2 offers, as a point of departure, a contrast between entrepreneurship in rich and poor nations. Section 3 outlines the theory of the innovating firm in which entrepreneurship has a role to play. Section 4 identifies the roles of entrepreneurship in new firm formation in terms of the types of strategy, organization, and finance that innovation requires, and emphasizes the ?disappearance? of entrepreneurship with the growth of the firm. In Section 5 I argue that, in the advanced economies, successful entrepreneurship in knowledge intensive industries has depended heavily upon a combination of business allocation of resources to innovative investment strategies, and government investment in the knowledge base, state sponsored protection of markets and intellectual property rights, and state subsidies to support these business strategies. One cannot understand national economic development without understanding the role of the developmental state. At the same time, the specific agenda and ultimate success of the developmental state cannot be understood in abstraction from the dynamics of innovative enterprise. It is through the interaction of the innovative enterprise and the developmental state that entrepreneurial activity inserts itself into the economic system to contribute to the process of economic development.entrepreneurship, innovative enterprise, developmental state

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002b) ‘Innovative Enterprise and Historical Transformation’,
  2. (2003a) ‘Stock Options and Innovative Enterprise: Evolution of a Mode of High-Tech Compensation’, INSEAD working paper,
  3. (2006a) ‘Evolution of the New Economy Business Model’,
  4. (2006b) ‘Globalization of the ICT Labour Force’,
  5. (2007b) ‘The US Stock Market and the Governance of Innovative Enterprise’,
  6. (2007c) ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Innovative Enterprise’,
  7. (2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus,
  8. (2001). A History of Top Management in Japan,
  9. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’,
  10. (2002). Airlines and Air Mail: The Post Office and the Birth of the Commercial Aviation Industry,
  11. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic, Change,
  12. (1990). and Takenori Inoki (eds)
  13. (1985). Betting on Ideas: Wars, Inventions, Inflation,
  14. (1996). Big Bills Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations are Rich, and Others Poor’,
  15. (2007). Boston’s Biotech Boom: A New “Massachusetts Miracle”?’, UMass Lowell Center for Industrial Competitiveness Working Paper’, May, available for download at www.uml.edu/centers/CIC.
  16. (1991). Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy.
  17. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3rd edn,
  18. (2000). China’s Leap into the Information Age: Innovation and Organization in the Computer Industry,
  19. (2004). Commission on the Private Sector & Development
  20. (2005). Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters’,
  21. (1988). Creating the Computer: Government, Industry, and HighTechnology,
  22. (1999). Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems,
  23. (2004). Doing Business in 2004: Understanding Regulation,
  24. (1965). Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History’,
  25. (2001). Employee Startups in High-Tech Industries’,
  26. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach’,
  27. (2005). Entrepreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the Genesis of New Ventures,
  28. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive’,
  29. (1999). Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research, National
  30. (1994). Higher Education for an Innovative Economy:
  31. (2007). Historical Statistics for the World Economy, 1–2003AD’, available at http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/.
  32. (1993). How the West Was Won: The Military and the Making of Silicon Valley’,
  33. (1983). Industrial Organization and Technological Change:
  34. (1980). Industrial Organization, Corporate Strategy and Structure’,
  35. (2002). Innovation and Market Structure in the Dynamics of the Pharmaceutical Industry and Biotechnology: Towards a History Friendly Model’,
  36. (2006). Innovation and the Evolution of Industries’,
  37. Innovative Enterprise and Economic Development’, in Y. Cassis and A. Colli (eds), Business Performance in the Twentieth Century: A Comparative Perspective,
  38. (1971). International Diffusion of Technology: The Case of Semiconductors,
  39. (2000). Inventing the Internet,
  40. (2000). Japan, Lancashire, and the Asian Market of Cotton Manufacturers, 1980–1990’, in
  41. (2002). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective,
  42. (1993). Learning and the Dynamics of International Competitive Advantage’,
  43. (2006). Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech,
  44. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy,
  45. (2002). Models of Capitalism: Debating Strengths and Weaknesses, three volumes,
  46. (1996). National Diversity and Global Capitalism,
  47. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis,
  48. (1991). Nature Incorporated: Industrialization and the Waters of New England,
  49. (2005). Organizing Venture Capital: The Rise and Demise of
  50. (1999). Path-Dependency versus Industrial Dynamics: An Analysis of Two Heterogeneous Districts’,
  51. (2001). Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity, Sage. 39 De Soto,
  52. (2000). Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities’,
  53. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism,
  54. (2006). Science Business: The Promise, the Reality and the Future of Biotech,
  55. (1996). Selling Silicon Valley: Frederick Terman’s Model for Regional Advantage’,
  56. (2004). Sequential Learning in a Chinese Spin-Off: The Case of Lenovo Group Ltd.’,
  57. (1992). Small Firms and the Provision of Real Services’,
  58. (2002). Small Loans, Big Claims’,
  59. (1990). Small-Scale Enterprise in the Ideology of the Italian Left’,
  60. (2006). Some Factoids About the 2005 IPO Market’, University of Florida, at http://bear.cba.ufl.edu/ritter/ Saxenian,
  61. (1999). Sources of Industrial Leadership,
  62. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise,
  63. (1987). Targeting the Computer: Government Support and International Competition,
  64. (1997). Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities’,
  65. (2004). The $800 Million Pill: The Truth Behind the Cost of New Drugs,
  66. (1990). The British Cotton Industry and International Competitive Advantage: The State of the Debates’,
  67. (1993). The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial Complex at MIT and Stanford,
  68. (1986). The Decline of the British Economy,
  69. (1999). The Developmental State,
  70. (1982). The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration’,
  71. (1979). The English Cotton Industry and the World Market, 1815– 1896,
  72. (2006). The Evolution and Allocation of Stock Options: Adapting US-Style Compensation to the Swedish Business Model’,
  73. (2006). The Fable of the Birth of the Japanese Automobile Industry: The Toyoda-Platt Agreement of 1929’,
  74. (2003). The Governance and Performance of Xerox’s
  75. (1994). The Grameen Bank and Poverty Alleviation in Bangladesh: Theory, Evidence, and Limitations’,
  76. (1960). The Growth of the Firm – A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company’,
  77. (2005). The Institutional Triad and Japanese Development’, [translated into Japanese]
  78. (1993). The Managerial Revolution and the Developmental State: The Case of U.S.
  79. (1992). The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion’,
  80. (1990). The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring,
  81. (2001). The Organization of Innovation in a Transitional Economy: Business and Government
  82. (1980). The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution, Johns Hopkins
  83. (2004). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation,
  84. (1994). The Small Firms Myth’,
  85. (1999). The Sociology of Entrepreneurship’,
  86. (2003). The Stock Market and Innovative Capability in the New Economy: The Optical Networking Industry’,
  87. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development,
  88. (1977). The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860,
  89. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business,
  90. (2002). To the Digital Age: Research Labs,
  91. (1996). Transforming Computer Technology: Information Processing for the Pentagon, 1962–1986, Johns Hopkins
  92. (1991). Why Do Firms Differ,
  93. (1998). Winning Markets or Winning Noble Prizes?
  94. (2002). You bought. They sold. All over corporate America, top execs were cashing in stock even as their companies were tanking. Who was left holding the bag?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.