Location of Repository

Does Intellectual Monopoly Help Innovation

By Michele Boldrin and David K Levine
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. [1990a], “Are Nonconvexities Important for Understanding
  2. (1990). [2001], “Intellectual Property: When is it the Best Incentive System?”
  3. (2001). [2001b], “Creating Markets for New Vaccines: Part II: Design Issues,”
  4. [2002], “Indefinitely Renewable Copyright,” Olin
  5. (1998). [2003], “Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change?” Oxford Economic Papers 55,235-264
  6. [2004], Innovation and Its Discontents,
  7. (2003). [2006], “Inventive Activities, Patents and Early Industrialization. A Synthesis of Research Issues”, DRUID w.p. No 06-28, www.druid.dk
  8. [2006], “James Watt as an Intellectual Monopolist.
  9. (1998). Be a Good Sport and Refrain from using my Patented Putt: Intellectual Property Protection for Sports related
  10. (1993). Carriages Without Horses: J. Frank Duryea and the
  11. (2002). Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office -
  12. (2005). Do Patents Facilitate Knowledge Spillovers? Evidence from the Economic Geography of Innovations
  13. (1995). Economic Effects of Strengthening Pharmaceutical Patent Protection
  14. (2004). Ex Ante versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property”,
  15. (2004). Free Culture,
  16. (2003). Global Welfare in Pharmaceutical Patenting”, mimeo Haverford College, December. Forthcoming in The World Economy.
  17. (1998). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by Technology Field,”
  18. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth”,
  19. (1984). Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspective,
  20. (2004). Innovation and Incentives,
  21. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance,
  22. (2000). Intellectual Property Institutions in the United States: Early Development and Comparative Perspective,"
  23. Kuhlik [2004], “Is There a
  24. Levine [2004b], “2003 Lawrence Klein Lecture: The Case Against Intellectual Monopoly”,
  25. Levine [2006], “Standing on Giants’s Shoulder. The Economics of Innovation in a Complex Economy”, work in progress, Washington University in Saint Louis.
  26. (2001). Meeting Nelson’s Concerns about Intellectual Property.” Paper presented at a Conference in Aalborg,
  27. (2000). Offensive Protection: The Potential Application of Intellectual Property Law to Scripted Sports Plays”,
  28. (1999). On the Optimality of the Patent Renewal System,”
  29. (2004). Opposing Copyright Extension,”
  30. (1989). Patenting University Research: Harry Steenbock and the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.” Isis,
  31. Posner [2003]: The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law,
  32. (2004). Quarter Notes and Bank Notes. The Economics of Music Composition in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.
  33. Riley [1992], The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information,
  34. (1996). Science, Economic Growth and Public Policy,”
  35. (1969). Sokoloff [2002], “Intermediaries in the U.S.
  36. (2006). Some Economic Aspects of Antitrust Analysis in Dynamically Competitive Industries”,
  37. (1991). Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law”,
  38. (2004). Strenghtening Intellectual Property Rights: Experience from the 1986 Taiwanese Patent Reforms”, mimeo, UCLA, Dept. of Economics. Available on line at
  39. (2006). The evolution and impact of genome patents and patent applications,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents,
  40. (1984). The Political Economy of Innovation, The Hague/Boston; reprinted: Martinus Nijhoff,
  41. (2005). The Struggle for Music Copyright”,
  42. (1911). The Theory of Economic Development,
  43. (2000). The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process”,
  44. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Are Some So Rich and Others So Poor?
  45. (2004). What’s at Stak ein MGM vs.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.