Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry: Economic Perspectives

By G. Cornelis van Kooten


Economists are rarely brought into the interdisciplinary research until the biophysical scientists have developed their models, made their measurements or completed their research task. The research economist is then brought in to do what amounts to a consulting task – provide some numbers that indicate impacts on the economy and employment. In this paper, I begin by illustrating cases from forestry where this leads to erroneous and costly policy outcomes. However, the main objective of this paper is to examine the role of genetic engineering in forestry and agriculture. In forestry, planting of genetically-modified (GM) tree species is nearly non-existent, with the exception of hybrid poplar that is used to produce pulp or fuel. However, as explored here, there is a role for GM tree varieties, particularly ones that are resistant to such things as the mountain pine beetle which has adversely impacted forests in British Columbia. I also examine the role of GM crops in addressing concerns about future food scarcity. As discussed here, there are various factors that suggest the world might encounter future scarcity. These include on the demand side a growing and wealthier global population, and greater demand for energy crops. On the supply side, there are fewer opportunities to expand farmland at the extensive margin, a decline in the rate of increase in productivity, limits to the amounts of inputs that can be applied at the intensive margin, and the closing of the gap between actual and potential crop yield. GM crops are one way to circumvent the potential shortages. However, there are many obstacles that need to be overcome before farmers globally can take advantage of transgenic research, including most importantly barriers put up by the European Union and various environmental NGOs on the grounds of the precautionary principle. These are discussed in some detail.precautionary principle; economics of genetically-modified organisms; agriculture and forestry; mountain pine beetle

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2010). Agricultural Biotechnology. Informing the Dialogue. New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Communication,
  2. (2011). Agricultural Statistics.
  3. (2011). Bio-energy from Mountain Pine Beetle Timber and Forest Residuals: The Economics Story. Submitted to Canadian
  4. (2006). Bioenergy Options for Woody Feedstock: Are Trees Killed by Mountain Pine Beetle in British Columbia a Viable Bioenergy Resource? Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Information
  5. (2008). Biopower Generation from Mountain Pine Infested Wood in Canada: An Economical Opportunity for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation,
  6. (2009). Climate Change Reconsidered:
  7. (2002). Enhancing the Crops to Feed the Poor,
  8. (2010). Implications of Expanding Bioenergy Production from Wood in British Columbia: An Application of a Regional Wood Fibre Allocation Model,
  9. (2004). Land and Forest Economics.
  10. (2005). Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle.
  11. (2008). Opposition to Transgenic Technologies: Ideology, Interests and Collective Action Frames, Nature Reviews 9(June):
  12. (1992). Rehabilitating the Backlog of Unstocked Forest Lands in British Columbia: A Preliminary Simulation Analysis of Alternative Strategies,
  13. (2003). Reinvigorating Genetically Modified Crops,
  14. (2011). Rising global Interest in Farmland. Can it Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? Washington, DC: The World Bank. (214pp.) FAO,
  15. (2008). Starved for Science. How Biotechnology is being kept out of Africa.
  16. (2009). Super Freakonomics. Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should buy Life Insurance.
  17. (2011). The New Harvest. Agricultural Innovation in Africa.
  18. (2005). The Precautionary Principle as a Basis for Decision Making, The Economists’ Voice 2(2): Article 8.
  19. (2011). The Problems with Precaution: A Principle without Principle, The American:
  20. (2010). The State of British Columbia's Forests. 3rd Edition. Victoria, BC: The Province of British Columbia.
  21. (2006). Why did “Operation Cremate Monsanto” Fail? Science and Class in India’s Great Terminator-Technology Hoax,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.