Location of Repository

Mathematics as the role model for neoclassical economics (Blanqui Lecture)

By Nicola Giocoli


Born out of the conscious effort to imitate mechanical physics, neoclassical economics ended up in the mid 20th century embracing a purely mathematical notion of rigor as embodied by the axiomatic method. This lecture tries to explain how this could happen, or, why and when the economists’ role model became the mathematician rather than the physicist. According to the standard interpretation, the triumph of axiomatics in modern neoclassical economics can be explained in terms of the discipline’s increasing awareness of its lack of good experimental and observational data, and thus of its intrinsic inability to fully abide by the paradigm of mechanics. Yet this story fails to properly account for the transformation that the word “rigor” itself underwent first and foremost in mathematics as well as for the existence of a specific motivation behind the economists’ decision to pursue the axiomatic route. While the full argument is developed in Giocoli 2003, these pages offer a taste of a (partially) alternative story which begins with the so-called formalist revolution in mathematics, then crosses the economists’ almost innate urge to bring their discipline to the highest possible level of generality and conceptual integrity, and ends with the advent and consolidation of that very core set of methods, tools and ideas that constitute the contemporary image of economics.Axiomatic method, formalism, rationality, neoclassical economics

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles



  1. (1995). [1926], “On a problem in pure economics”,
  2. (1979). [1933; 1937], “The new logic”,
  3. [1947], “The mathematician”,
  4. (1996). [1948; 1950], “The architecture of mathematics”, in:
  5. 1877, “Matematica applicata all’Economia Politica”,
  6. (1983). 1931?, “The formalist foundations of mathematics”,
  7. (1986). 1931?, “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I”, in Collected Works,
  8. 1943-44, “A synthesis of pure demand analysis”,
  9. (1990). 1987?, The Invisible Hand,
  10. 1995a [1932], “New orientation of economic theory. Economics as an experimental science”,
  11. (1996). 1996a [1918], “Axiomatic thought”, in EWALD
  12. 2003-04, “Economic evidence on the existence of collusion: reconciling antitrust law with oligopoly theory”,
  13. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility”,
  14. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty”,
  15. Clower on axiomatics”
  16. (1998). Controversy: axiomatisches mißverständnis”,
  17. David Hilbert and the Axiomatization of Physics (1894-1905)”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences,
  18. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk”,
  19. (1984). Economic theory in the mathematical mode”,
  20. (1998). Ethics and the Excluded Middle.
  21. Fixing the point. The contribution o f early game theory to the tool box of modern economics”,
  22. (1990). Foundations and Fundamental Concepts of Mathematics. Third Edition,
  23. (1985). General Equilibrium Analysis. Studies in Appraisal, Cambridge:
  24. (2002). History of consumer theory from Menger to Debreu”, Working Papers IEP, Università Bocconi – Milan, n.9. __ 2003, Storia della teoria neoclassica del consumatore (1871-1959): una prospettiva neokantiana,
  25. History of economics becomes a science for cyborgs”,
  26. (1952). History of the Cowles Commission 1932-1952”, in Economic Theory and Measurement: A Twenty Years Research Report, 1932-1952, Chicago: Cowles Commission.
  27. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science,
  28. (2000). How to compute equilibrium prices in 1891”, Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers,
  29. (2004). In the lobby of the energy hotel: Jevons’s formulation of the postclassical ‘economic problem’ ”,
  30. (1999). Irving Fisher’s Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices”,
  31. Is the mind irrational or ecologically rational?”,
  32. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases”,
  33. (1906). L’economia matematica ed il nuovo manuale del Prof.
  34. (2002). Machine Dreams. Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science,
  35. (1954). Mathematics: logic, quantity, and method”,
  36. (1980). Mathematics. The Loss of Certainty,
  37. (2003). Modeling Rational Agents. From Interwar Economics to Early Modern Game Theory,
  38. (1996). Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures,
  39. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: a reply to Kahneman and Tversky
  40. (2000). On the Methodology of Economics and the Formalist Revolution,
  41. (1954). On the use of mathematics in economics”,
  42. Plott’s collected papers on the experimental foundations of economic and political science”,
  43. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk”,
  44. (1998). Psychology and economics”,
  45. (2004). Rationality, Mind, and Machines in the Laboratory: A Thematic History of Vernon Smith’s Experimental Economics,
  46. (1986). The Cowles Commission in Chicago, 1939-1955,
  47. (1991). The mathematization of economic theory”,
  48. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Daniel Kahneman”,
  49. (2004). The Nobel Prize in behavioral and experimental economics: a contextual and critical appraisal of the contributions of Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith”, Review of Political Economy,
  50. (1991). The school of Mathematical Formalism and the Viennese Circle of mathematical economics”
  51. (2005). The trouble with mathematics and statistics
  52. (1970). The work of Nicolas Bourbaki”,
  53. (1959). Theory of Value,
  54. (1997). Value, sign and social structure: the ‘game’ metaphor and modern social science”,
  55. (2003). Vernon Smith’s insomnia and the dawn of economics as experimental science”,
  56. (1989). Von Neumann and Karl Menger’s Mathematical Colloquium”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.