Article thumbnail

Housing tenure and housing demand in Colombia.

By María Angélica Arbeláez, Roberto Steiner, Alejandro Becerra and Daniel Wills


Using the 2003 and 2008 Quality of Life Surveys, we identify the factors that affect housing tenure decisions in Colombia and explore the determinants of the demand for rentals and purchases. Variables affecting the choice between buying and renting include civil status, education, age of the household head, size of the household and whether the household resides in an urban area. Households with higher income are more likely to purchase than to rent and the choice of formal housing is positively associated to wealth. Interestingly, households eligible for social housing subsidies are more likely to purchase than to rent and those working in the informal sector are more likely to purchase informal dwellings. Demand is quite responsive to price changes as well as to changes in the price of rental (its closest substitute). The elasticity to permanent income for both buying and renting is similar to that observed in other developing countries, and is higher for those working in the informal sector. This suggests that subsidies and other interventions aimed at fostering demand should not exclude those holding informal sector jobs. Demand is highly responsive to positive shocks to income, a fact probably associated with credit constraints being binding. Subsidies have a large positive impact on demand. Likewise, access to mortgage credit is an important determinant of demand. Finally, savings have a positive effect on demand in 2008, not in 2003. A plausible explanation is that a policy intervention that began in 2000 -i.e, a tax exemption for households that established savings accounts destined for housing purchases-only had an effect in the upper part of the business cycle. In both cases (i.e. subsidies and credit) the positive effect on demand is entirely explained by demand for social housing. "This paper is part of a cross-country project sponsored by the IADBs Research Network".Housing demand, tenure choices, housing market policies, Colombia.

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). A la vivienda quien la ronda?”, Instituto Colombiano de Ahorro y Vivienda, Universidad Externado de Colombia,
  2. (1996). Alternatives to House Ownwership: Rental and Shared Submarkets in Informal Settlements” Thesis,
  3. and Koizumi,N.(2006). “Living on a plot of land as a tenure choice: the Case of Panama”. Housing Economics.
  4. (1983). Cross-Sectional Estimation of a Simultaneous Model of Tenure Choice and Housing Services Demand”
  5. (2007). Determinantes del acceso al crédito de los hogares colombianos”,
  6. (1999). Economic analysis of housing markets in developing countries and trasition economies. In:
  7. (2003). Estudio Critico de la
  8. (2006). Evaluación de los Instrumentos de Apoyo a la Politica de Vivienda de Interes Social”, Marulanda Consultores.
  9. (2005). Foundations of Housing Finance”
  10. (1995). Hong Kong housing markets: overview, tenure choice, and housing demand",
  11. Housing Decisions and the U.S. Income Tax”.
  12. (2009). Housing Demand in Mexico”
  13. (1984). Housing Demand in the Developing-Country Metropolis” Housing Demand in the Developing-Country Metropolis.
  14. (2007). Housing Demand, Tenure Choice and Housing Policy in Brazil” Mimeo.
  15. (2009). Income Poverty and Unsatisfied Basic Needs”,
  16. (2007). Informalidad del mercado de crédito para la vivienda de interés social”,
  17. (2003). La teoría económica de la favela: cuatro notas sobre la localización residencial de los pobres y el mercado inmobiliario informal”
  18. (2007). Línea de redescuento de Vivienda de Interés Social”,
  19. (2010). Los determinantes de la demanda de vivienda en las ciudades de Guayaquil, Quito y Cuenca: un análisis multinomial”. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral.
  20. (2004). Precios Inmobiliarios en el Mercado de Vivienda en Bogotá 1970-2004”, Universidad de los Andes, Documento
  21. (2009). Socioeconomic Status Measurement with Discrete Proxy Variables: Is Principal Component Analysis a Reliable Answer?
  22. (1980). The demand for housing in developing countries: the case of Korea",
  23. (1999). The price elasticity of housing in Britain: issues of sample selection.
  24. (1999). There´s more than one way to get a hose: Housing Strategies in Panama”, Inter-American Development Bank.