Location of Repository

Deeper Integration: What Effects On Trade

By Martin Clever and Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso

Abstract

The focus of this paper is to estimate the effect of the different types of regional trade agreements on the volume of trade between country pairs. The analysis will employ the “empirical workhorse” of international trade; the gravity model. We hypothesize that the deeper agreements have a stronger effect on trade, especially when considering the extensive margin of trade. When controlling for the extensive margin of trade, the multilateral trade resistance terms, and the endogeneity bias we are able to obtain satisfyingly accurate treatment effects of the different types of regional trade agreements. Using a panel of 50 countries over the period 1980-1999, we find that customs unions, “deep” free trade agreements, and common markets have stronger effects on bilateral trade than simple free trade agreements.Regional trade agreements, Deep integration, International trade flows, Gravity equation, Panel data

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1995). An Empirical Model of Sunk Costs and the Decision to Export” The World Bank, International Economics Department, International Trade Division Policy Research Working Paper 1436,
  2. (2004). and Eric van Wincoop, “Trade Costs”, NBER Working Paper Series Working Paper 10480,
  3. (2009). Are regional trading agreements beneficial? Static and dynamic panel gravity models.”
  4. (2007). Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International Trade? “,
  5. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data,
  6. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 3 rd Edition,
  7. (2004). Economic determinants of free trade agreements”
  8. (2006). Effects of Regional Trade Agreements Using a Static and Dynamic Gravity Equation“, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research (IAI) Discussion Papers NR.149,
  9. (2002). Free Trade Agreement, http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/ Pavcnik, Nina, “Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from
  10. (2006). Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations”,
  11. (2003). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to The Border Puzzle”, American Economic Review,
  12. (1999). Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, and Transport Costs” The World Bank Development Research Group, Policy Research Working Paper 2257,
  13. (2003). Kicking Away the Ladder: The “Real” History of Free Trade” Foreign Policy in Focus,
  14. (2001). Mercosur – Another Failed Move to Regional Integration”
  15. (1995). National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns”,
  16. (2008). New measures of trade creation and trade diversion”,
  17. (2000). One money, one market: the effect of common currencies on trade,"
  18. (1996). Regionalism and Deeper Integration - Integrating National Economies, The Brookings Institution,
  19. (2006). Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model“,
  20. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the
  21. (2003). The Impact of Trade on
  22. (2006). The Log of Gravity”,
  23. (2000). Trade Agreement, http://www.efta.int/ European Union, http://europa.eu/index_en.htm Head, Keith and Thierry Mayer, “Non-Europe: The Magnitude and
  24. (1993). Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Econometric Study of U.S. Import Policy,"

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.