Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Customer Relationships and the Provision of Trade Credit during a Recession

By TSURUTA Daisuke


We investigate the effect of close customer relationships on small firms' provision of trade credit during the 2001-2003 recession in Japan. Many studies argue that close customer relationships are costly for suppliers because when their main customer has a high proportion of the firm's total sales, suppliers cannot easily find alternative customers. As a result, the supplier's bargaining position is weaker. Then suppliers that depend largely on their main customer cannot easily reduce their provision of trade credit, despite the need to do so during a recession. The results in our paper indicate that close customer relationships are not costly for suppliers in trade credit contracts. First, small businesses offer less trade credit, even if the proportion of sales to their main customers is high. Second, suppliers offer less trade credit if they are in financial distress and charged higher interest rates by banks, even when they are dependent on their main customers. Third, highly leveraged dependent suppliers reduce trade credit, unlike highly leveraged independent suppliers. This implies that dependent suppliers can cut back on trade credit in the presence of leverage. These findings imply that close customer relationships are beneficial for suppliers.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). Are Trade Creditors Relationship Lenders?,”
  2. (2008). Bank Information Monopoly and Trade Credit: Do Only Banks Have Information about Small Businesses?,” Applied Economics,
  3. (2004). Buyer-Supplier Relationships and Trade Credit,”
  4. (2007). Customer Market Power and the Provision of Trade Credit: Evidence from Eastern Europe and Central Asia,”
  5. (2007). Debt Structure and Bankruptcy of Financially Distressed Small Businesses,”
  6. (2001). Determinants of Trade Credit
  7. (2004). Does Competition Encourage Credit Provision? Evidence from African Trade Credit Relationships,” The Review of
  8. (2005). Does Trade Credit Substitute for Bank Loans? Evidence from Japanese SMEs (in
  9. (1999). Evidence on the Determinants of Credit Terms Used in Interfirm Trade,”
  10. In-Kind Finance: A Theory of
  11. (1999). Interfirm Relationships And Informal Credit In
  12. (2008). Market Power and the Matching of Trade Credit Terms,”
  13. (1994). The Benefits of Firm-Creditor Relationships: Evidence from
  14. (2000). The Exploitation of Relationships in Financial Distress: The Case of Trade Credit,”
  15. (2008). The Implications of Trade Credit for Bank Monitoring: Suggestive Evidence from
  16. (2007). Trade Credit and Bank Credit: Evidence From Recent Financial Crises,”
  17. (2002). Trade Credit and the Bank Lending Channel,”
  18. (2004). Trade Credit as a Competitiveness Tool; Evidence from Developing Countries,”
  19. (2006). Trade Credit in Small and Medium Size Firms: An Application of the
  20. (2002). Trade Credit Terms Offered by Small Firms: Survey Evidence and Empirical Analysis,”
  21. (2007). Trade Credit: Suppliers as Debt Collectors and Insurance Providers,” The Review of Financial Studies,
  22. (1997). Trade Credit: Theories and Evidence,” The Review of Financial Studies,
  23. (2009). Trade Receivables Policy of Distressed Firms and its Effect on the Costs of Financial Distress,” Financial Management,
  24. (2009). What You Sell is What You Lend? Explaining Trade Credit Contracts,” Review of Financial Studies,
  25. (2005). When Do Trade Credit Discounts Matter? Evidence from

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.