Article thumbnail

Legitimacy to develop fair value measurement standards: The Case of the IVSC Discussion Paper – Determination of fair value of intangible assets for IFRS reporting purposes

By Adela Deaconu, Cristina Silvia Nistor and Crina Filip


This research studies, through a content analysis of the comment letters to the IVSC project on fair value determination of intangible assets, the legitimacy of this professional body, or of the accounting associations, to develop measurement standards specific to this accounting concept. At present, with the exception of FAS 157, no professional standard offers clear technical solutions for fair value determination for financial reporting purposes. We have come to the conclusion that, among respondents, accountants are more reserved than valuators in what regards the IVSC regulating of the fair value measurement. The Anglo-Saxon respondents are more open to accept the IVSC DP as compared to respondents from other countries, hence the IVSC legitimacy to develop fair value measurement standards. Generally, we consider that accounting bodies, rather than valuation bodies, should have legitimacy to develop fair value measurement standards.fair value, professional standards, valuation techniques, guidance, project acceptation, value hierarchy

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). Accounting: an international perspective,
  2. (1990). An accounting historiography: subject matter and methodology,
  3. Comment letters for IVSC Discussion paper: Determination of fair value of intangible assets for IFRS reporting purposes,
  4. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities,
  5. (1996). Critical and interpretative histories: insights into accounting’s present and future through its past,
  6. Discussion paper: Determination of fair value of intangible assets for IFRS reporting purposes,
  7. EU Implementation of IFRS and the fair value directive – A report for the European Commission – Executive Summary.
  8. (2002). Fair value accounting and the management of the firm,
  9. (2005). Fair value methodologies,
  10. (2006). FAS 157 Fair Value Measurements,
  11. International Valuation Standards, 7 th edition, translation in Romanian,
  12. Lobbying behaviour and the development of international accounting standards – The case of the IASB’s joint venture project,
  13. (2002). Practical Research Methods,
  14. (2003). The adoption of accrual accounting in Flemish public centers for social welfare: examining the importance of agents of change, working paper,
  15. (1980). The impact of disclosure and measurement practices on international accounting classifications,
  16. (2005). The quality of fair value measures for property, plant, and equipment,
  17. (1997). Toward theory of stakeholders identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts,
  18. (1998). Towards a general model of the reasons for international differences in financial reporting,
  19. (2009). Valoarea justă – concept contabil (Fair value – an accounting concept), MBA course, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, available in Romanian by request to the author,