Location of Repository

FDI spillovers and local productivity growth: evidence from Indian pharmaceutical industry

By Jaya Prakash Pradhan


The study tests the FDI spillover hypothesis in the Indian Pharmaceutical industry using an unbalanced panel data for a sample of firms over the period 1989-90 to 2000-01. The study estimates firm-specific productive efficiency growth for domestic firms from frontier production function and relates the same to a set of firm-specific attributes along with the variables of foreign presence. The study found that the presence of foreign firms per se may not be important for productivity growth of domestic firms unless it is complemented by the latter’s R&D activity or size. Therefore, the study concludes that policy efforts to encourage R&D and some concentration of size of the domestic firms in the industry may be more desirable than passively liberalizing the FDI policy from the point of view of increasing productive efficiency of local enterprises.FDI; Productivity; Pharmaceutical Industry

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles



  1. (1993). Are there Positive Spillovers from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Panel Data for Morocco’,
  2. (2000). Are there Regional Spillovers from FDI in the UK?’,
  3. (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela’,
  4. (2002). Does Exporting Lead To Better Performance? A Microeconometric Analysis of Matched Firms’, Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy,
  5. (2001). Does FDI Contribute to Technological Spillovers and Growth? A Panel Data Analysis of Hungarian Firms’,
  6. (2003). Economic Reforms, WTO and Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Industry:
  7. (1999). Exports and Economic Performance: Evidence from a Panel of Chinese Enterprises, World Bank (mimeo).
  8. (2001). Foreign Direct Investment and Efficiency Benefits: A Conditional Quantile Analysis’, CEPR Discussion Paper,
  9. (2001). Foreign Direct Investment and Intra-Industry Spillovers: A Review of the Literature’,
  10. (1979). Foreign Direct Investment and Spillover Efficiency Benefits in Canadian Manufacturing Industries’,
  11. (1997). Foreign Direct Investment as A Catalyst For Industrial Development’,
  12. (1999). Foreign Direct Investment, R&D and Spillover Efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan's Manufacturing Firms’,
  13. (1986). Foreign Investment and Productive Efficiency: The Case of
  14. (1983). Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in an Underdeveloped Economy: Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry’,
  15. (1996). Local Technological Capability and Productivity Spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan Manufacturing Sector’,
  16. (1997). Malaysia: Enterprise Training, Technology and Productivity, A World Bank Country Study,
  17. (1994). Multinational Corporations and Productivity Convergence in Mexico’,
  18. (1998). Multinational Corporations and Spillovers’,
  19. (1990). Production Frontier with Cross-Section and Time-Series Variation in Efficiency Levels’,
  20. (1984). Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level’,
  21. (1999). Productivity Growth in Indonesia: The Role of Regional Characteristics and
  22. (1996). Productivity Spillovers from Competition between Local Firms and Foreign Affiliates’,
  23. (2000). Productivity Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from UK Industry Level Panel Data’,
  24. (2000). Productivity Spillovers from Technology Transfer to Indian Manufacturing Firms’,
  25. (1986). Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s’,
  26. (2001). R&D and Technology Spillovers through FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity’, CEPR Discussion Paper,
  27. (2001). Regional Underdevelopment: Is FDI the Solution? A Semiparametric Analysis’,
  28. (1975). Returns to Research and Development Expenditures in the Private Sector’, Reprinted in Z. Griliches
  29. (1999). Technology Gap, Competition and Spillovers from Direct Foreign Investment: Evidence from Establishment Data’,
  30. (1999). Technology Transfer and Spillovers: Does Local Participation with Multinationals Matter?’,
  31. (1994). Technology, Market Characteristics, and Spillovers’,
  32. (2001). The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Domestic Firms:
  33. (1980). The Origin and Direction of
  34. (2001). Trade Regimes and Spillover Effects of FDI: Evidence from Uruguay’,
  35. (1999). World Investment Report: Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.